A night of surprises
The winner is announced, but it’s not who we expected
Emma Baker 1:00am GMT 21st October 2010
Did I say anything could happen? The winner of the 16th International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition is Yulianna Avdeeva, the fiery Russian who performed the E minor Concerto on Tuesday night. Audience favourite Ingolf Wunder shares joint second prize with Lukas Geniušas, Daniil Trifonov is third, Evgeni Bozhanov fourth, and François Dumont fifth. There is no sixth prize. Wunder won both the Concerto and Polonaise-Fantaisie prizes, Avdeeva the Sonata prize. Trifonov was awarded the Mazurka prize, Genušias the Polonaise prize.
First, we must congratulate Yulianna Avdeeva for her wonderful achievement. Three prizewinners’ concerts and two dates with the New York Philharmonic await her, perhaps a contract with a major label. But, her victory was a surprise. In the Philharmonic Hall, where the results were announced just before midnight, the atmosphere was most interesting: one of astonishment. Wunder had the popular vote and he was expected to win. This was clearly reflected in the crowd’s subdued reaction to Avdeeva’s victory, which can’t have been easy for her.
I am writing this shortly after the announcement, a few of hours after we heard the last three finalists, Lukas Geniušas, Hélène Tysman and François Dumont. Incidentally, Dumont, who played the Fazioli throughout the Competition, used the Steinway for the finals. There was no explanation offered – I wonder what happened?
But, to return to the results: rather than speculating about the Jury’s decision, I think, after a good night’s sleep, we should all go back to the Competition website http://konkurs.chopin.pl and review the winners’ performances, stage by stage, in order to gain some insight – with the benefit of hindsight, of course. And what do you think?
Comments
I had the winner in 3rd place. There is one blog website that reviewed every performer in every stage, 148 mini-blogs (reviews). Makes interesting reading now that it's over. http://chopin2010blog.com is the link but this blogger only got 4 of the 6 winners and then in the wrong order.
"this blogger only got 4 of the 6 winners and then in the wrong order."
But isn't it great that in art, unlike sport, the wrong order is also right.
Dear Sirs,
We please take a few minutes of your time to read this initiative which has been conceived to support and encourage all those cultural associations and institutions that organize with determination and passion national and international piano competitions in order to concretely help talented young pianists.
We firmly believe that competitions are valuable means to support young artists and give them new incentives. Unfortunately, more and more pianists are becoming discouraged, demotivated and dissatisfied with the current state of the competitions organized in Italy, Brazil, Korea, Russia, Belgium, Poland, France, Norway, Andorra, Ukraine, USA, Mexico and ALL OVER THE WORLD !!!!!
We collected many attestations of young competitors through the pages of our forum – called Pianoforum.it; we investigated thoroughly, we asked their opinions and, in the end, we concluded that there is a real need of greater attention and care by the organizers so that any doubt or distrust can be replaced by sincere enthusiasm and confrontation.
For these reasons, we ask:
that the jury will be carefully selected among the Musicians of proved international renown, which careers can be a concrete example of expertise in piano performance.
That the competition can be an example of support and attention to the laureates not only for that brief period after the edition, but also for a longer period in which, for example, they could be invited for other concerts or events, or for taking part in the jury or in the artistic directions of new editions.
That the regulations will carefully consider the relationship between juror and pupil, removing categorically the possibility of having students in the competition and excluding the rule of abstention of a juror who is also teacher of a candidate. This will not only assure honesty, transparency and fairness to every competitor but also protect the winners from inevitable doubts about their classification if they had one or more teachers in the commission;
That the lists of candidates, with the names of the teachers who have supervised their preparation, are public and visible on the competition website or on notice boards in the headquarters of the competition;
That all the stages are open to the public;
That there is greater clarity in the rules under which the jury will deliver its review and that possibly these judgments are made manifest;
That the prizes and any other benefit provided for in the regulations will be delivered in a reasonable short time;
That the organization of the competition is committed to create partnerships with the largest number of musical seasons so that the winners can be offered secure performing opportunities; for this reason the artistic directors can be invited to attend the competition or take part in the jury in the final stages, in order to invite one of the candidates in their seasons.
that the Artistic Directors of the competitions, called to appoint the members of the jury, do not use the competition for their own purposes, or do not use the competition as a mean to increase their job opportunities (concerts, or sitting in the jury of another competition, for example) through the formula of the exchange;
Finally, we hope that the reader could realize how this sincere claim on absolute clearness for present and future music competitions will imply not only their greater success, but also a responsible care for the future of many young musicians who dedicate their life to music, which we hope should be judged with the utmost correctness. Hoping that this need of a new way towards cleanness, honesty and fairness must be undertaken, we wish the constructive purposes of our proposal could be welcomed as a moment of healthy confrontation for the music's sake.
To: giopepegiopepe@gmail.com and AAF - Gustav Alink" <mail@alink-argerich.org>,
Thanks for your attention