To clap or not to clap…
Does traditional concert etiquette still apply in the cinema?
Live cinema screenings seem to be popping up all over the place. The opportunity to watch some of the finest productions locally and at an affordable price is an appealing concept and a variety of arts companies have been experimenting with this new genre. But as with most developing projects, there are a few grey areas.
Friday’s live broadcast of the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra at cinemas across the UK was part of their digital concert hall series, featuring works by Stravinsky and Rachmaninov. The performance was thoroughly enjoyable, as one would expect from the renowned orchestra, but I couldn’t help wondering about the correct way to act. Should we clap at the end? Should we be quiet in between pieces? Were the pre-concert talks part of the whole programme or was attendance optional?
Concert hall etiquette normally plays a prominent part in classical music concert halls; I know when to be quiet, when to talk, and when to clap. Yet cinema conventions are in many ways more introverted and applause is much more of a rarity. In this case, does the cinema-concert hall hybrid contradict our natural instincts in both environments?
The questions I had were not answered during the course of the evening, as it seemed that no one really knew what was appropriate. This is likely to be because there is, in fact, no ‘correct way’. In reality, our group effort to conform to both conventions resulted in confusion, coming close to awkwardness at times. It seems natural to want to applaud after an impressive work, yet at the end of The Rite of Spring, the cinema fell silent. This was contrasted with the rapturous applause given by the audience in Berlin and as the cameras panned out, it was evident that we were very much onlookers to the event. If we had all been clapping, I might not have felt so detached. Having felt so close to the orchestra just moments before, as the careful execution of the camera team glided between close ups of individual players and sections, this connection was stopped abruptly as the wide shots emphasised the distance and I was left feeling slightly underwhelmed.
If it had not been for the confusion over protocol there would have been little of the evening to fault. The pre-concert talks given by Sir Simon Rattle, the chorus master and Berlin correspondent explained the music clearly and in an accessible way. The programmes given out added a lovely touch and the seats were much more comfortable than those in most concert halls!
With the winter season approaching, there are many more performances scheduled for broadcast. I hope that as audiences become more accustomed to this developing digital genre, it may also become more natural to applaud. Even though the players may not be there to hear our gratification, it still seems important that we clap if for no other reason than to show our appreciation and enjoyment to each other.
Rebecca recently completed a music degree at the University of Nottingham. She is currently studying for a masters degree in journalism at City University London.


Comments
I just attended a Cincinnati Symphony concert last Saturday with Louis Langree conducting Messain, Saint-Saëns and Franck. The audience clapped between the two movements of the Saint-Saëns piano concerto. I typically don't mind but it's gotten out of hand here. The Boston Symphony posts an ettiquette page on their website which of course pertains to clapping at the wrong time, unwrapping celophane wrapped candies, etc... This very well could become the standard practice for live video casting as well.
But to answer the proposed question, I then need to return a question; 'would a group of friends clap after listening to a live broadcast on the radio'? Maybe, depending on the circumstances, but in most cases it would seem a bit out of place. So how is live video transmission any different from live radio transmission? Yes, I can see the conductor but I still have no influence over the 'buzz' in the concert hall.
I can see where it becomes ambiguous for those viewing the 'big screen' but I'm often a cereberal guy and if people were to clap at the movie theatre, I would liken it to me clapping for my turkey sandwhich just before I ate it.
Applause is a form of tangible feedback to the performer so there's not much point in clapping at a
cinema is there. But what about clapping between movements? The etiquette
referred to is uniquely applicable to orchestral music. Go to a jazz concert
and each solo will be applauded - rightly so in my opinion.
At the RLPO concert last night a lone clapper applauded the beautiful viola solo at the end of one of the movements of RV-W's London Symphony. Obviously he was wrong and the rest of
us were right... Not so really, the performance deserved a measure of feedback so, whoever you were, good on you!
Perhaps if we want to broaden
concert attendance we need to relax a little and display some emotion?
There's a strange parallel with Rebecca's thoughts about music in cinemas and concerts of electronic music. If the composer isn't in attendance, should one look towards the stage and applaud after an electroacoustic piece? I'm never certain what the expectation is. Are audiences expecting little Oompa Loompa-like performers to emerge from inside the speakers? Or are they applauding simply because, you know, it's a concert thing?