The Dvorák you don’t know - but should
Time for a focus on the rest of the quartets and symphonies
Without seeming to think about it consciously, seasonal changes have a big impact on my listening habits, and autumn usually means spinning a lot more of Brahms’s chamber music – particularly the String Quintets and Sextets and just about anything by Sibelius. This autumn, it’s the music of Dvorák that’s been keeping me busiest, and while some of his more popular works have brought pleasure, it’s been repertoire that I barely know that has caught my imagination and kept me thoroughly engaged.
By definition, a composer’s more famous works tend to eclipse his or her less well-known creations. What makes the case of Dvorák so interesting, though, is that there is such an abundance of high quality music that is living in the shadows of such warhorses as the ‘New World’ Symphony. People who know the ‘American’ Quartet might suspect, because it’s the only quartet that seems to be programmed regularly, that Dvorák only wrote a couple of string quartets. But in fact, he wrote a total of 14! The ‘American’, Op 96, is his 12th. While the two that followed are undisputed masterpieces (though barely known when compared to the ‘American’), there are several earlier ones that deserve to be heard, and even programmed, with some regularity, such as the Quartet No 5 in F Minor, which I couldn’t stop listening to this weekend (thankfully, I still have my set of complete Dvorák Quartets by the Prague String Quartet on DG, one of the all-time chamber music glories from Big Yellow). It’s a soulful, earthy work, full of hauntingly beautiful melodies, and, in comparison to its predecessors, it is relatively concise (the first few Dvorák Quartets last about 45 minutes apiece, while No 5 stretches to just over a half hour long).
The second movement of No 5 will cast a special spell for anyone who has come to love the composer’s ‘Romance’ for Violin and Orchestra: the thematic material of the of the former clearly provides most of the melodic material that comprises the ‘Romance’. It’s a truly gorgeous movement. The waltz movement that follows begins with a slightly frantic edge that quickly melts away like lifting fog, but then just as quickly returns. The final sprint of the last movement has that sparkling vitality that defines so much of the composer’s music. All in all, this wonderful quartet makes me eager to know all 14 of the Dvorák quartets. In all my years living in New York City there have been at least a few complete cycles of quartets by Bartók, Beethoven and Shostakovich. Is it too much to hope that some intrepid ensemble – and a correspondingly generous arts presenter – will do Dvorák justice and get him a complete string quartet cycle sometime soon here in the capital of the New World?
Turning to Dvorak’s nine Symphonies, New York has been lucky enough to hear several inspired performances of the last three, which are widely considered his masterpieces. In the past two seasons, for example, Iván Fischer and the Budapest Festival Orchestra, and, more recently, the New York Philharmonic under Alan Gilbert (Gilbert is a client of my company), have played the dark and elusive Seventh. While the first six Dvorák symphonies don’t have the admirable concision of his last three, they have no shortage of catchy melodies, quirky energy, Wagnerian richness and copious joy. Thanks to Spotify, eMusic and my own rather large record collection, I was able to listen repeatedly to recordings of Symphonies 1-6 over the past few weeks, and I wouldn’t want to part with any of my discoveries. A few of the highlights:
- Myung-Whun Chung and the Vienna Philharmonic give rich, glowing performances of the three-movement Third Symphony and more expansive Sixth Symphony (both on DG), the latter possessing a fiery, slightly-demonic scherzo (or ‘Furiant’, the proper name for the Bohemian dance Dvorák sometimes employed) that is utterly thrilling.
- István Kertész’s fresh and bracing romps through the spirited First and Second Symphonies with the London Symphony (from the classic Decca set of the complete nine) were full of unexpected delights, though both are admittedly a tad long-winded. Still, I want to hear both of them again.
- And Neeme Järvi’s urgent, exuberant takes on the Fourth and Fifth Symphonies (from a complete Chandos cycle) did not disappoint. The opening of the Fifth is as memorable as anything else Dvorák wrote, followed by a soulful andante suggesting Tchaikovsky, another winning scherzo, and a finale that threatens, in the final bars, to go up in flames.
All of Dvorák’s quartets and symphonies will stay close to my stereo in the coming days and weeks, the perfect soundtrack for the cooler days and longer nights ahead.
Do you have recommendations for further Dvorák listening? Please share them by posting a comment below.
Albert Imperato is co-founder of 21C Media Group, a classical music and performing arts PR, marketing and consulting firm. His on-line journal gives a window into the New York music world, as seen through the eyes of a leading PR guru.



Comments
The Dvorak 5th quartet is a magnificent work - I completely agree! But does anyone know anything about how this work is "reconstruction" by someone else after Dvorak wrecked the score?
Great article. I made a link to it from our blog "Forgotten String Quartets" www.forgottenstringquartets.com
I am happy with the Kubelik set of all the symphonies, scintillating and precision in the sixth as an example. I read that Greghales has the complete quartets by the Prague. What is his opinion about it? And has anyone the complete supraphon set of the quartets.
As for the symphonies, i heard last year life the seventh by Ivan Fischer. And do you know what he did? He put the woodwinds on the first row. Brilliant balance and precision, but that is what you can expect of him. Maybe if he records all the Dvorak symphonies, it will be a miracle. After all if i have to name the top 3 of conductors , i would say Gergiev, Dudamel and Fischer and not necessary in that order.
Apart from the Symphonies and String Quartets, which, however, are uneven (they are not all at the same level), there is glorious music in his other Chamber music, like the incredibly interesting Piano Trios (op. 65 is a gem), the second Piano Quartet, the magnificent second Piano Quintet, the two String Quintets, the String Sextet, the Serenade with Strings, his Violin/Piano music and some Songs of course.
However, I believe Dvorak's unmatched masterpiece is his Cello Concerto in b minor (arguably the greatest cello concerto of all times).
Parla
I couldn't agree more, Parla -- all of the other chamber works you mention are gems. Hard to believe, greghales, that I forgot to mention the Kubelik set of Dvorak Symphonies! I wish DG would remaster the whole set as the performances of the 8th and 9th that came out in the "Originals" series sounded better than the rest of the cycle. Brilliant performances, though! And thanks for the kind comments, lylechan: visited your blog quickly the other day, and will return to give it a closer look. PatrickMertens, have you heard Fischer's recording of Symphony No. 7?
One shouldn't overlook Dvorak's masterly tone poems either, in particular not when played by the Czech Philharmonic under Chalabala on Supraphon, in glowing warm sound provided by the wizzards Sip and Burka.
I agree, indeed tone poems are essential listening for any Dvorak enthusiast. I recommend to give a listen to wonderful Kubelik versions on DG.
So glad you enjoyed the post, dingan. You make a real great point about Dvorak's diversity. Excited to know that there are still a ton of his works that I'm not familiar with -- I suspect my Dvorak binge will continue for a long while.
I like the Prague cycle of the Dvorak Quartets...it is the only complete cycle I have of the Dvorak. I have not heard another group doing the complete cycle to compare. I know there are some other full quarter cycles out their, have heard some of the quartets but not all. Supraphon has a complete cycle of Dvorak with the
Panocha String Quartet. I have not heard enough of this cycle to say better/worse then Prague Quartet. I might get that cycle eventually, but no plans to do so soon unless I see it for a super low price.
The Legends orchestral version.
Many thanks Albert for your advocacy of Dvorák! Four decades ago in my native Chile I learned to appreciate Dvorák's early Symphonies through broadcasts from a classical-music Radio in Santiago (Radio "Andres Bello", now extinct). They programmed items from the Kertesz LSO album but some fascinating Supraphon early recordings as well. In fact, I learned Nros. 3 and 5 in versions by Smetacek and Sejna (which I own today in wonderful Supraphon remasterings). The same applies to the Symphonic Poems on Erben (Chalabala). Of course I have the complete Kubelik/Berlin, Kertesz/LSO and Neumann/Czech Philharmonic sets in my collection -alongside the last three Symphonies with Barbirolli, Davis, Szell, Giulini and Dohnányi plus many isolated items- but I retain a distinctive affection for the early Supraphon recordings. Place of pride I give to Karel Ancerl's recordings of Nros. 6 and 9 and Overtures. The sound of the Czech Philharmonic is simply delicious, including some perky vibrato in the clarinets! I had the privilege to attend a series of Dvorák concerts given by the Emerson Quartet at the Alice Tully Hall in 2010 and agree completely with your assessment of the enormous musical value of the late Quartets and the Cypresses as well. But we should not forget the Magnificent Requiem either, or the Violin and Piano concertos. As for the Cello Concerto I agree with Parla: it is the absolute summit of the genre.
Warmest regards
AL