Les Miserables turns 25 with a new production

After a quarter of a century, Boublil and Schönberg’s musical gets a makeover

James Inverne 6:19pm GMT 24th September 2010

One of the downsides of having such a mammoth success with a musical that it runs for decades is that the original production tends to remain the production, rolled out internationally ad infinitum. Definitive is one thing, practically exclusive quite another. There have, of course, been the odd new stagings, often to accommodate different scales of venue – I once saw a downsized touring Miss Saigon (no helicopter) and, in Denmark, a somewhat bizarre rock-concert style Les Miserables. Sir Cameron Mackintosh, the producer of both of those shows as of Phantom of the Opera, once told me about a rather hair-raising Phantom staging somewhere abroad where UK health and safety regulations didn’t apply, and the chandelier fell at vertiginous, nerve-jangling speed.

But still, even these tend to be variations to some extent on the originals. And whereas in opera there is a healthy tradition of throwing some fascinating new lights on works with new, if sometimes deeply unusual stagings (imagine Phantom set in space – like a certain German Ring cycle I could mention), this is rare with what we might term the 1980’s juggernauts (Cats, Starlight Express, Phantom of the Opera, Les Miserables, Miss Saigon). So the announcement of a new 25th anniversary production of Les Mis, premiered in Cardiff and now brought to London’s Barbican Centre, where Trevor Nunn’s original started in 1985, was rather exciting. No Nunn, no John Napier sets, no on-stage turntable. Would this reveal something new about the old(ish) warhorse? Yes and no, is the answer.

The evening starts very encouragingly – where dedicated Les Mis fans have been raised (bear in mind I first saw the show when I was 11) to expect forlorn prisoners wielding pickaxes on a chain gang, the audience is now presented with the hot belly of a galley-ship, complete with anguished convicts at the oars, beaten by prowling, Claggart-like police. Thereafter, in place of backdrops there are projections, often and aptly of Victor Hugo’s own paintings – and sometimes the projections venture into the world of special effects, as with a superb sequence when they take us down into the Parisian sewers where the villainous Thenadier scavenges trinkets from the corpses of dead students. Yet directors Laurence Connor and James Powell never let the graphics overwhelm, and blend them brilliantly with traditional stage devices (best of all for one key moment, where a projected bridge, a few pieces of real set and a flying wire combine for an especially thrilling death scene).

All of that said, there are probably more similarities with the Nunn than there are differences. We still get the red flag flying over the crowd, the en masse marching in time during One Day More, the gates of Jean Valjean’s house look the same. So this is rarely a radical reimagining (though some sequences now work better, as with the depiction of the seedy, narrow alleyways where Valjean gets mugged).

Where it does score above all, though, is in new thought, new life given to the characters and their relationships. Valjean, as winningly played here by John Owen Jones, moves from a truly thuggish, bestialised ex-con (you wouldn’t want this chap anywhere near your house) to redeemed sinner. Earl Carpenter, like Owen Norris a veteran from the West End production, is an obsessive by-the-rules rather than demonic Javert. Katie Hall’s Cosette shows interesting touches of rebellion against her over-protective foster parent.

They pay attention to the smaller roles, too. In this incarnation, the drunk revolutionary Grantaire becomes a major figure, a disillusioned and despairing poet-cynic (a moving performance from Adam Linstead).

Most excitingly, the energy of a work re-explored pulses through the show. This first night felt like the first night. Every cast member threw themselves at their roles, occasionally to the point of over-doing things, but I was pinned to my seat. The new orchestrations, by Chris Jahnke, are more hit than miss and certainly it all sounds very now (though I could have done without the odd pop styling from Rosalind James’s feisty Eponine). They even had a bona fide UK charts star in the cast, Gareth Gates, as an earnest but slightly reedy-sounding Marius. Now – how about setting the next version in New York’s Little Italy (copyright applications to Dr J Miller, care of English National Opera, please)?

James Inverne

James Inverne is former editor of Gramophone. He now runs a music management + PR company, Inverne Price Music Consultancy, writes a culture column for the Jewish Chronicle newspaper and his byline can still be found from time to time in other places about subjects that get him exercised.

Comments

It's not NORRIS. It's John Owen-Jones. John Owen-Jones. OWEN-JONES. JOHN. John Owen-Jones.

 

 

I know this is only a blog, and not the real magazine, but why is Inverne allowed to keep harping on about musicals? Just because he's editor? He may like musicals - undoubtedly does - but how many Gramophone readers want to know? Why can't he stick to the subject of his magazine and talk about this kind of stuff in a personal blog, if he feels the need?

It seems to me he's somehow trying to legitimise the music of musical theatre as something like classical music, whereas anyone who's sat through an hour or even 10 minutes of a Lloyd Webber or Sondheim show ought to know it's anything but.

Thanks for the correction on my stupid typo to the first poster above - that's what happens when you try to write a blog and prepare for next week's Gramophone Awards at the same time! Now I look forward to the speech at the awards where I inadvertently salute Colm Wilkinson... Anyway, I've made the adjustment above.

 

Wigmaker, I appreciate and understand your viewpoint but in these blogs we allow a certain amount of breadth to consider associated genres which we feel our audience may be interested in. Musicals in part emerged from opera, and in fact Les Mis is operatic in structure and can bear in my opinion the same kind of critical approach that one might take with, say, Andrea Chenier (for the sake of argument). 

 

All the best,

James

Is that the production with Susan Boyle in it – surely the Renata Tebaldi de nos jours?

Well I have just returned from the final performance at the Barbican and it was wonderful!  I saw the original production years ago and I enjoyed this every bit as much.  Having seen it about four times with different cast over the years it really stands the test of time and long may it run!

Robert.

The children from our drama group were in the O2 anniversary concert last night. It has lost none of it's magic!  I believe there are millions who would have walked through fire to be standing where they were. Awesome.

And incidentally, the scoring and structure of Les Miserable could stand up against most classical works.