Million dollar maestro

Muti awarded the Birgit Nilsson Prize 2011

James Jolly 11:28am GMT 16th March 2011

It’s just been announced that Riccardo Muti has been awarded the Birgit Nilsson Prize 2011 for exemplifying “all of the qualities that were so important to Birgit Nilsson: extraordinary work, dedication and passion for music over many decades”. That’s probably true though Muti seems to be one of those conductors more admired by orchestras of the top flight than by audiences – and his repertoire has always struck me as being safe in the extreme and his commitment to new music virtually negligible. But what does seem questionable is the cash sum that comes with the prize – $1 million, the largest sum given in the world of classical music. 

The gap between conductors’ salaries and those of the musicians they conduct is dubiously wide – in a report a few years ago, it was revealed that of the 10 top-league American orchestras six rewarded their conductors with a salary of over £1m (highest grossing maestros were Maazel in New York: $2.2m; Levine in Boston: $1.5m and Michael Tilson Thomas in San Francisco: $1.5m. With Levine’s Met salary added to his Boston remuneration his earnings about five years ago totalled $3.5m according to an article in the Boston Globe). 

It’s hard to imagine that the Chicago SO have offered Maestro Muti a substantially reduced salary from his predecessor Daniel Barenboim who took home $1.9m, so we can assume that he must earn more than $1m for a minimum of ten weeks subscription concerts per season (that would work out at $25,000 per concert if Muti conducted four concerts each week in those ten). And I’m sure he doesn’t run Rome Opera for pocket-money either. 

Now, I don’t begrudge Muti his prize – his concerts with the Philharmonia when I was a teenager were the most exciting events on the London musical scene and his work in the opera house has generally been very fine – but what good does a $1m gift to Muti do for the world of music? How many new pieces of music could that commission? And more pertinent to Birgit Nilsson’s legacy, how much good could that sum do if directed at musicians at the other end of their careers? How many potential Isoldes and Brünnhildes could be allowed to nurture their voices and dramatic skills free of financial worries, and leave a genuine memorial of Nilsson’s art? In these times when arts organisations the world over are feeling the squeeze as never before how good it would be to hear that Maestro Muti were putting his wind-fall to genuinely creative and altruistic use.

James Jolly

James Jolly is Gramophone's Editor-in-Chief. After four years of co-presenting BBC Radio 3's weekday morning programme "Classical Collection" has moved to Sunday mornings, with Rob Cowan his fellow presenter; he also hosts some Saturday afternoon shows. His blogs will explore live and recorded music, as well as downloading and digital delivery.

Comments

JJ - Frustrating to see the arts community functioning like the financial community - 'them that's gots - gets'

Maybe Maestro Muti and the previous year's winner, the equally well paid Placido Domingo, could pool their award money and start another charity! 

 

MAK

Goodness me, what a whinge!

Domingo won two years ago actually, since the proze is awarded every 2nd year. He has used the money to set up Birgit Nilsson's Prize at Operalia (The World Opera Competition). There will be two of them awarded at the Competition in Moscow in 2011. If I am not mistaken, they are awarded to Wagnerian singers. Is this not a way of encouraging and awarding young singers?

As for Maestro Muti, is it not possible that he might do a similar thing with the money and support young conductors? I suggest that we should not be too quick and envious to judge.

Finally, it was Birgit's money and I, for one, am happy that she chose to do what she wanted to do with her money and her legacy.

Enough whinging, please!