What’s missing from the Proms?

Many fine concerts await, but Gramophone's reviews editor says we should be alert to emerging trends

Andrew Mellor 10:59am GMT 23rd April 2012

We might as well admit it: as much as we like to moan about the content of the Proms season when it’s published, the concerts themselves invariably deliver something special and something brilliant. It’s easy to run a finger down the listings and deliver an instant ‘disappointing’ verdict, not so easy to see the bigger structural pictures and logistical triumphs. When the cookie crumbles, I know I’ll be skipping down Exhibition Road after some brilliant evenings at the Albert Hall this summer – and that keeping an open mind as to which concerts that will prompt is part of the fun.

But if you sensed that was a caveat, then you’re right. Scanning a mildly interesting Proms season repertoire-wise, I’m left wondering where all the interesting orchestras have gone.  And I don’t mean the Berlin Philharmonic and the Leipzig Gewandhaus. Yes, they’re coming (two of only eight foreign orchestras at this year’s Proms, a quarter of which are youth or student ensembles), but they’re in London week-in week-out. The Gewandhaus even has a residency here. I mean the decent orchestras we don’t hear but who would rise to the occasion and offer something different – and arguably something far more exciting than the big-guns who are prone to resting on their laurels and delivering frankly boring concerts.

Two ensembles without many laurels to rest on are the St Louis Symphony and the São Paulo Symphony Orchestra, both on this year’s schedule. The singular Proms experience will be new to them and I’d bet good money they’ll revel in it and throw themselves into the atmosphere. Last year the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra delivered a far more exciting show than their illustrious Pennsylvanian neighbours from Philadelphia, who played a neat but dull concert two days later.

And what about orchestras who can bring something special from their homelands? There’s (joyfyully) a plethora of Sibelius this summer and conductors Mälkki, Vänskä and Storgårds, but it’s now five years since we had a Finnish ensemble at the Proms – even though Finland remains the per-capita engine room of the European classical music scene and its orchestras are playing astoundingly well. No Danish, Norwegian, Polish or provincial German orchestras, despite the fact that they’ve come to dominate the record market.

Without a time machine or a hotline to Proms director Roger Wright, it’s difficult to know if the festival is heading in a new direction: away from varied visiting orchestras playing core-classical repertoire and towards concert performances of operas, operettas and musical theatre and Broadway works. If it is, let’s hope it’s the right ingredient for the continued success of what seems to be an unstoppably successful event – and reflective of what Henry Wood and Robert Newman envisaged.

Personally, I prefer my opera in the opera house and my Broadway…well, on Broadway – where I can dip into it for two hours once a decade. It’s certainly not prevalent on Radio 3 and it doesn’t seem to me to fit the station’s documentary tone. As for orchestras, I guess I’ll have to head back to the Reading Hexagon or Cadogan Hall to hear decent foreign orchestras who are keen to impress. Which is a shame, because I’d rather hear them at the Proms – its unique atmosphere and alert, committed audience would ensure a memorable night for all of us. 

Andrew Mellor

Andrew Mellor is Reviews Editor at Gramophone magazine and writes widely for orchestras, opera companies, periodicals and websites in the UK and Scandinavia.

Comments

 

If you lived where I do (in Boston, US) you would have to go a long way to find the variety that you get at the Proms. We would be lucky even to get the sheer variety of visiting orchestras that you do, and we are always grateful for any orchestra that comes to visit. I hate to say it but it seems that the art of whingeing is still very much alive over there.

If you have the luxury of being able to afford to see opera or
Broadway musicals in the opera house and on Broadway at today's
prices that's great. A lot of us can't always afford it and to see
something semi staged with quality at a reasonable price would be very good
alternative.

It also enables young people who want to see an opera for the
first time to see it without paying too much and in the company of other young people. If classical music is to survive more young audiences are what we
urgently need.

I don't think these kinds of comments help the cause of classical
music at all and lend credence to more accusations of elitism.

Well said!

The Proms is certainly cheap - but we're lucky in London that it's possible to get tickets for English National Opera for only a few pounds more than a 'promming' £5 ticket.

Opera is a theatrical art form; I think the best way to introduce people to it is by letting them see/hear it as the composer intended, not via a concert performance. It's the equivalent of trying to get someone interested in Shakespeare by taking them to a 'reading' of a Shakespeare play, with no supporting stagecraft.

I appreciate that we're lucky in London to have such a brilliant festival at the Proms, but I feel more could be done with it. It's our job as journalists to put things in context; our context in this case is a large amount of musical activity most of which is very accessible financially. 

I am not sure that a concert performance of opera can be equated to the equivalent of getting someone interested in Shakespeare to a 'reading' and is that so wrong?  We have Shakespeare performed on the radio, as we do operas. Should we therefore not have operas made available on the radio, purely on the basis that we cannot see the theatrical art form? Surely a concert performance of an opera, whilst perhaps not perfect, may allow people to hear music from what might otherwise be a very expensive work to perform in its full theatrical form, and might well introduce someone to a composer's work that they then want to hear more of that composer and be motivated to to see operas in the future? 

If it's about accesibility - on which front I agree that opening up the artform is an absolute priority - I'd simply say that in my experience of taking friends with no registered interest in 'classical' music to live events, staged opera has far more impact - probably because the narrative is more apparent and there are theatrical devices most people can latch on to.

Of course, Chris, there is nothing inherently wrong with play readings and I enjoy plays on the radio - but, as with concerts, I feel if I were 'introducing' someone to the artform I'd rather take them to the theatre than sit them in front of a radio play (same with an orchestral concert).

As for equating one with the other, it's irrefutable that a play reading and an opera in concert are comparably one and the same: the interpretative 'reading' of the text/score without any supporting theatrical parephanalia. Whether that's how the Proms operas will work is another question...

The best way to make concerts excite new audiences is to have them played with a real sense of excitement, commitment and discovery...hence my point about visiting orchestras.

 

Hi Andrew. A thought-provoking piece which makes us think about programming, both of works and artists.

As I've said over on the Proms thread, one of the delights for me in the last five years has been the chance to hear some cracking orchestras, the Bavarian Radio and the Concertgebouw amongst others.

The only issues with the 'biggie' orchestras are that pricing goes up on that evening, and sell-out happens quickly, so it's either purchase a much dearer ticket, or accept an equally expensive return.

Generally, the price of the proms is great, and you can get either a £5 prommer ticket as you say (still useful of course for students) or £15 gets you a fairly decent seat.

It's not the price of the proms tickets that's the problem, it's the cost of B&B in a pretty standard 3 star London Hotel, which on average is about £90-£120. And the three stars are average, and the four stars aren't much better. Two or three nights with your travel etc...and it starts to cost as much as a week's holiday somewhere else. I wish the hotels would cotton on to the thousands who visit London for the proms and offer some kind of scheme.

By the way, having seen a concert performance of one of Il Trittico a couple of years ago it worked for me, as I remember thinking that the drama was evident in the music. Which is not to say of course that it wouldn't be better staged fully.

Mark

Whilst being sympathetic towards those less fortunate to hear the sheer variety of orchestras that we are fortunate to hear in London I do share Andrew Mellor's subtle disappointment at this year's Proms season. There are some interesting parts to it, but nothing that knocked me over from excitement. It's a good average programme. 

Unstaged operas do work in some cases - depending on the music. I'd rather hear the Meistersinger in concert performance than one of those all too common horriffic stagings. Wagner is fine in concert performance, while it works much less for a Barber of Seville...