A Conundrum.

11 replies [Last post]
History Man
History Man's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2012
Posts: 87

A second rate work by a first rate composer or a first rate work by a second rate composer?

Bearing in mind that "second rate"is used in a literal sense.Not, as often meaning no good. Is the best of Hummel superior to the weakest of Beethoven. Does the first symphony of Miaskovsky compare with the same of Shostakovich?
Listening to the Nursery suite by Elgar,the thought struck me, despite being a minor work that bears no comparison with The Enigma variations,it is sill Elgar and touched with his magic. The Symphonic studies by Rawsthorne is a greater work,but it gets far less plays then the Nursery suite on my system. Am I being unfair to Rawsthorne and all the other "second rate" composers.Maybe.

Sidney Nuff
Sidney Nuff's picture
Online
Joined: 12th Oct 2012
Posts: 142
RE: Countdown Conundrum.

A second rate composer is incapable of producing a 'first rate work', he can produce a good second rate work but that's not the same. That is what makes him a second rate composer. A first rate composer can though produce a second rate work from time to time.
Fools are stupid all the time, they have no choice. However a wise man can choose to be wise or can choose to be stupid. He has the choice.

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2089
RE: A Conundrum.

I guess Sid put it a bit rudely, but he is, in essence, right.

Whoever might be considered as a "second rate" composer cannot be redeemed on account of a better work vis a vis a less well written one by an established great composer.

The fact that we may listen more often even to minor works by great composers compared to some masterworks by minor ones can be relied upon the issue that the features of the genius, the musicianship, the craftsmanship and ingenuity are always present in the opus of the great ones. An individual masterpiece by an unknown, lesser known or not well established composer stands as an important work as such.

In sum: there might be a very well written concerto by Hummel that can compete Beethoven's Second Piano Concerto, but, we tend to listen more often to the latter, because we love to trace and enjoy the features of Beethoven's writing rather the individual virtues of Hummel, which might be very interesting for occasional listening but not for overshadowing Beethoven's work.

Parla

tagalie
tagalie's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2010
Posts: 798
RE: A Conundrum.

History Man wrote:
The Symphonic studies by Rawsthorne is a greater work,but it gets far less plays then the Nursery suite on my system. Am I being unfair to Rawsthorne and all the other "second rate" composers.Maybe.

I find the Symphonic Studies fascinating for a different reason. It's a struggle to think of another composer who showed so much promise so early, and totally failed to live up to it. His first piano concerto has its moments but, in general, whatever Rawsthorne had seems to have been spent in the Studies.

Shostakovich and Stravinsky peaked early too but managed to produce interesting, sometimes great, works thereafter. Poor old Rawsthorne found himself wedged into that dreaded category, a "composer's composer", code for dry as dust.

Sidney Nuff
Sidney Nuff's picture
Online
Joined: 12th Oct 2012
Posts: 142
RE: A Conundrum.

parla wrote:

I guess Sid put it a bit rudely.

Parla

Me rude, surely not!

naupilus
naupilus's picture
Offline
Joined: 7th Apr 2010
Posts: 372
RE: A Conundrum.

There is some truth to what Sid says - and you could add that often what marks out the best from the rest is that they do develop their skills over time. If you look at somebody like Verdi his earliest operas are touched with hints of the later marvels but are very much weaker works. He learned on the job, as most people do. Had he not had the talent and graft to do that I doubt we would still listen to his music as frequently.

For me the problem is not that Hummel is not as good as Beethoven. It is that in the concert hall Hummel hardly gets a look in. To be honest I would be much happier these days to see a piano concerto by Hummel or a Spohr symphony on a concert program than another performance of the Beethoevn second piano concerto. If you want a fool's errand then of course you go on some mythical quest to find an 'undiscovered masterpiece' but there is a great deal of pleasure to be spent listening to some of the non-household name composers. And I have to say, for me at least, every time I return to somebody like Beethoven after spending a little time with Ries, Spohr, Hummel or someone else I fnd my appreciation of all more heightened.

 

__________________

Naupilus

History Man
History Man's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2012
Posts: 87
RE: A Conundrum.

No Sid I don't think you are being rude either.

Debussy is a composer of genius.Satie on the other hand,frankly bores me.That does not stop me listening and enjoying Gymnopedies (Debussy must have rated it as well, as he orchestrated it) which is much finer then the Debussy Suite Bergamasque for example.

Staying on a french theme.Saint-Saens,of the second division (better word) composed a first rate and one of my favorite violin concerto's,the third.The Organ symphony arguably comes in the same category.

Can think of many other examples of works where a composer has excelled himself,but can only manage this feat once or twice in a lifetime.Conversely even a "great"can have a bad day at the office.

33lp
33lp's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Apr 2010
Posts: 486
RE: A Conundrum.

Well if we follow HM who decides who is first rate or second rate; obviously some are first rate without question but is Saint Saens second rate? Are the 2nd & 4th piano concertos & the third symphony second rate? I would suggest not.

Parla says we listen more to lesser works by great composers but how much of that is due to concert programmers? I tend to agree with Nauplus - a Beethoven concerto again on tonight's Radio 3 concert - when was a Hummel concerto last performed at a live concert in Britain (or anywhere else)?

Because of this my record & CD listening tends perhaps to be of the lesser known because I can hear so many live broadcast performances of the core repertoire. The Vox-Turnabout Hummel concerti, particularly the double concerto, are amongst my most played recordings which I still prefer to more recent versions, no doubt because I heard the old ones first & know them so well. 

History Man
History Man's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2012
Posts: 87
RE: A Conundrum.

I am a season ticket holder at West Ham United FC and supported the club for more years then I am prepared to admit.Is my club as good or talented as Manchester United or Chelsea?Of course not.Does
this mean I love them less?In fact it makes me love them more.

The chamber music of Faure is something I am completely immersing myself.The deeper I go the greater my respect and love for the music.Not for one moment would I suggest that the opus of Faure(or Saint-Saens/Hummel) by any stretch of the imagination, compares with the three B's or Mozart.It lacks the depth,the comprehensiveness. The ability of "first rate composers"is to compose masterpieces in ALL categories,be it chamber,concerto,song,symphony,etc,etc.

That maybe is the difference. LVB wrote nine first rate symphonies (slight understatement!) Saint-Sains did one.It is not me who decides who is second rate.It's obvious.

Thankfully, we all do not only read Shakespeare,actually I have never read Shakespeare!Give me Joe Nesbo anytime.I know what I like.

BazzaRiley
BazzaRiley's picture
Offline
Joined: 14th Mar 2010
Posts: 314
RE: A Conundrum.

History Man wrote:
I am a season ticket holder at West Ham United FC and supported the club for more years then I am prepared to admit.

A fan of Saint-Saens AND the Hammers. And I thought I was the only one!

:oD

History Man
History Man's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Mar 2012
Posts: 87
RE: A Conundrum.

There's a surprise.Never thought come across a fellow happy Hammer around these parts.All the best too you.

BazzaRiley
BazzaRiley's picture
Offline
Joined: 14th Mar 2010
Posts: 314
RE: A Conundrum.

Thanks. Need something to cheer me up after today's disaster. :(