Classical music newbie
I hope this isn't the wrong forum. I'm after a bit of advice about which composers and pieces that you might be able to suggest?
I know certain bits of classical that absolutely rock my boat that I remember from my old man's collection. Generally it's your bombastic and threatening soviet style music that you can imagine the end of the world happening to, or twinkly magical moonlit piano music a la Chopin. I certainly know that I don't like flouncy pompous arpeggio based music that was made for people in white wigs to ignore while they ate canapes.
Could you suggest perhaps five pieces for me? Thanks so much in advance!
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Dear Bobby,
God only knows what advice you are going to get over the next few days......
But the truth is it is simply impossible to recommend five. There isn't anything like a consensus on these things, so everyone will recommend a different five. Classical music starts around 1000 AD and is still running today; it encompasses many styles and many different periods. If you are serious about getting to know a bit, the only sensible thing to do is to get some kind of compilation album - there are dozens on Spotify - and see what takes your fancy. You might like monks chanting in an old monastery, or Bach on the harpsichord or wierd, out of tune stuff from 1935. When you find something you like, follow it up and get a bit more.....and so on. It is a journey and it never stops.
And by the way, there is no "flouncy pompous arpeggio based music that was made for people in white wigs to ignore while they ate canapes." That's just a foolish, class-based stereotype invented by people who don't understand classical music and like to write it off as a expression of snobbery.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Dear Bobby,
God only knows what advice you are going to get over the next few days......
And by the way, there is no "flouncy pompous arpeggio based music that was made for people in white wigs to ignore while they ate canapes." That's just a foolish, class-based stereotype invented by people who don't understand classical music and like to write it off as a expression of snobbery.
Come on Jane, what about Boccherini, or as he is affectionately known, Mrs Haydn.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Didn't mean to sound quite so rude on my last post, Bobby......I only meant that it is a bit like saying, "repetitive, drum-based music made for uneducated cretins to bounce up and down to."
Music is music. Some of it is good and some of it is bad........
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Sorry, I thought the flouncy white wig thing might have been a step too far. I find it hard to describe the exact genre I mean. Just as there is music in any genre that is off-puttingly pomous to my personal taste, there is some classical that has the same feeling. In the back of my mind the only term I can think of is "chamber music" but I am too scared to use it in case I look even more foolish!
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Thanks for the replies so far by the way. I know it's a vast ask!
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Chamber music really just refers to a small group of instrumentalists producing non secular music. Music di chiesa, for the church, sung religious. And music de chambre, for the house, non religious. You can get some really modern chambre music, atonal, loud, avoid it, it makes little sense. Start with Mozart, if you like certain instruments look at concertos that are written for them.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
No need to apologise, Bobby. You didn't look foolish at all. I probably shouldn't have said anything.......
I think what you probably mean is the kind of music that appears on period dramas, usually during a dance or an outdoor event of some kind (ladies twirling their parasols, men tipping their hats, ah, Mr Rawchester! etc). That is usually "classical" music - i.e. from the Classical Period (roughly 1750-1820, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven). That can sound a bit flouncy and insipid if you are listening to the wrong stuff, especially if it is a pastiche rather than the real deal.
Look, what about this? What if I suggest a few (short and fairly representative) pieces that run through the various stages of classical music? (Ignoring my previous advice!).
Let's start around 1700 and ignore everything before that (which many people do anyway):
1. Bach - Prelude in C sharp minor, from Book 1 Well-Tempered Clavier. (Last about 90 seconds)
2. Mozart - 1st movement, Symphony no. 40 in G Minor (you will know this.....about 7 or 8 minutes).
3. Beethoven - 2d movment, 5th Piano Concerto (Emperor) About 7 minutes.
That covers roughly a hundred years of classical music - from 1700ish to 1800ish. Have a listen and see if you like any of them. Later, you can move into the 1800s and the "Romantic" era, but see how you get on with those for now.....and if you find them flouncy, which you might.
Jane
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Oh, I forgot to mention that we have a slight Troll problem here. He (I think it is a he, anyway) keeps getting banned, but then he comes back with a new name. He is currently using about eight names (Sidney Nuff, norma de plume......). If you get anything wierd or offensive, just ignore it: he doesn't speak for anyone else.........
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I''d pick up a used copy of the Norton Anthlogy of Western Music and find the works that are featured in that. This way you'll know which pieces and which excerpts exemplify a certain writing style or period and you'll also have sections of the score. I believe that there are 3 volumes in total but you can start wherever you like. Here's a link;
http://books.wwnorton.com/books/Norton-Anthology-of-Western-Music/
goofyfoot
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Bobby, you're going to get as many views as there are posters on this forum, none more or less valid than any other. Plus, you're going to have to make up your own mind as to who's playing with a full deck on here.
My own view is that anyone entering classical music from the world of pop, rock, jazz etc. shouldn't start in the classical period (late 18th, early 19th centuries). At this point the genre is just too foreign to your taste, too redolent of the powdered wigs and frills you're looking to avoid. The subtleties of passion and anger in Mozart are less apparent to a classical newbie than are similar emotions in, say, Tchaikovsky, Mahler or Shostakovich. If your interest in classical music lasts long enough you'll probably find yourself gravitating to the Haydns and Mozarts because wigs or no wigs, their music is incredibly good.
I'd stick to orchestral music (symphonies, concerti, some ballets) at first. Lots of power in Beethoven, particularly a work like the fifth symphony, and very little wigginess. Tchaikovsky isn't one of my favourites but even those not particularly keen on classical music find his 4th, 5th and 6th symphonies stirring.
I came to classical music from rock (many years ago) so I might as well just give you a list of the stuff that first hit me. Very different from Jane's list so you're going to have to do your own sampling, find out whose tastes coincide with yours and go from there:
Shostakovich 5th and 10th Symphonies
Prokofiev 3rd Piano Concerto and Romeo and Juliet ballet
Sibelius 4th and 5th Symphonies and Violin Concerto
Walton 1st Symphony
Bartok Concerto for Orchestra
Stravinsky Rite of Spring, Firebird, Petrushka
Holst The Planets
Tchaikovsky Symphony 5
Gershwin Rhapsody in Blue
Borodin Symphony 2
Dvorak Symphony 8
If some of these have slipped down or off my listening chart since, I can still recall the impact they had on me initially.
Just a couple more thoughts:
1) Versions matter when it comes to classical recordings. Don't assume that because a particular work doesn't quite click with you, that it never will. It may be the performance that's at fault.
2) Don't give up on anything first time around. Most 'serious' music requires many listens to reveal its secrets.
Happy listening and if you find anything on my list or Jane's, (or anybody else's), registers, come back for further recommendations.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Fantastic! You guys and girls are brilliant. There are definitely some on that list that I love already. Holst, Dvorak and Gershwin have been in my radar since childhood. I will look the rest up and give them serious listening time.
I agree on the versions thing, I write and produce music for a living and one take of a song in one studio is not equal to another take in a different studio.
If it helps with any more suggestions, Gorecki's symphony no.3 "sorrowful songs" is something that absolutely blows me away. Also my favourite non-classical song in the world is The Flamingoes "I only have eyes for you". I'm sure there must be classical that conjours the same imagery.
Thanks for being so patient!
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Beyond any possible list or suggestion(s) from anyone of us, if you really wish to grow from "newbie" to a "child" and further on, read few things about how Classical Music has been created and established itself in the previous centuries and works (what is all about). Along the way, you may sample some "signature" works of major composers of different periods. I think the links goofyfoot offered you could be an easy way out and a very helpful tool too.
Don't try to get to know Classical Music as a "blind date".
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive


For Mr Boombastic elephantastic soviet style try Shostakovich, symphony 10 but start with the second movement. For twinkly magical moonlit piano try Mozart or Debussy's suite Burgermuncher. For flouncy pompous arpeggio music for people in white suits and blonde wigs try Abba.