Great passacaglias...
I am just now listening to the third movement of Lutoslawski's Concerto for Orchestra, which is titled 'Passacaglia toccata e corale'.
For some reason I really find myslf drawn to anything composed in the form of a passacaglia. I don't know why - being non expert in composition it is not a love of the compositional technique, just a love of the way passcaglias play out. I am particulary fond of Webern's Passacaglia.
Does anybody else have a liking for the form or do you hate it?
Naupilus
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Great passacaglias are fine, but you need to consider personality as well.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
As a form is one of the most serious along with the Chaconne. Great composers have written some quite interesting and magnificent works in these forms, particularly in the Baroque era.
Bach's glorious Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor or the third movement of Ravel's Piano Trio are some superb examples of a most creative and inventive use of the form.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I'm with you all the way, Naupilus. Among my personal favourites are the one in Grimes, Frank Martin's, and Shostakovitch's in the 1st Violin Concerto, the theme of which is so brilliantly transformed in the finale.
Also, thanks to a Troyen recommendation, I'm just getting to know and admire the Irgen-Jensen Passacaglia.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I'm with you all the way, Naupilus. Among my personal favourites are the one in Grimes, Frank Martin's, and Shostakovitch's in the 1st Violin Concerto, the theme of which is so brilliantly transformed in the finale.
Also, thanks to a Troyen recommendation, I'm just getting to know and admire the Irgen-Jensen Passacaglia.
The Irgens-Jensen was completely new to me before that recommendation (as was Irgens-Jensen himself, I must admit), but I can't remember another piece of music which impressed me so much on very first hearing for many a year.
JKH
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Hi Naupilus et al!
Yes, I'm with you on the Lutoslawski and the Webern, which is a fine piece and one of his more substantial compositions.
Tagalie - agree with you that the Frank Martin is a really good piece, and I have it in both organ and orchestral versions.
There is also an extraordinary example of the form in Penderecki's Magnificat - section V. The movement is actually entitled Passacaglia but is not just an orchestral interlude as it includes voices as well. The ground bass is simply a low D repeated 13 times in the cellos and basses, so no melody as such in the ground bass. Over this we get the usual Penderecki of great swathes of sound and dramatic blocks. It is unusual but very impressive. (It is also one of only 3 scores I have by Penderecki and one of my favourite works by him).
Must check out the Irgens-Jensen!
Mark
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
For me, the Baroque was the great age for this form. Antonio Bertali and Tarquinio Merula wrote some fine ones. And Lully created several glorious examples in his later operas, especially Armide and Roland -- 10-12 minute spans of continuous music, beginning with the orchestra and gradually adding soloists and chorus, then scaling back down to just instruments again. Rameau copied this trick in Les Indes Galantes and elsewhere, but not at the same length.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Hi Naupilus et al!
Yes, I'm with you on the Lutoslawski and the Webern, which is a fine piece and one of his more substantial compositions.
Must check out the Irgens-Jensen!
Mark
Mark, I too need to check the Irgens-Jensen...
Regrding the Webern, what do you meman by substantial? I only ask as I have never found any of his music anything less than concentrated and fascinating. I am very much indebted to Pierre Boulez's recordings of Webern, which I feel are pretty much without parallel. I suppose part of the proble is Webern is so very diffciult to describe - Berg (another brilliant composer) created music with greater beauty and Schoenberg is much easier to grasp (for me at least) when I place him in the context of Brahms (I actually really like to play Schoenberg and Brahms together when I am listening - it just works).
Naupilus
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I find myself compelled to fully agree with mussessein about Baroque and the triumph of this particular form.
Apart from the ones mussessein mentioned, there are five superb Passacaglias, one by the French Louis Couperin (in g minor) for Harpsichord and four by the Germans :
- Biber's for Solo Violin (in g minor too) and the one in the last of the "Mystery Sonatas" for Violin and B.C.: Some of the best and very demanding as well inspiring music written for the violin.
- Kerll's Passacaglia in d minor for Organ : a glorious piece of substantive development and austere beauty.
- Buxtehude's magnificent Passacaglia in d minor, BuxWV 161 for organ and
- Bach's monumental Passacaglia and Fugue in c minor, BWV 582, the most divinely inspired, deeply elaborated, superbly structured work for this form. It has been orchestrated by quite a few for large Orchestra, most notable the master composer of orchestration Respighi and the master maestro of orchestration Stokowski. It has been transcribed by Liszt as well for piano.
It's quite interesting that the form attracts (almost) exclusively the minor mode (see above), while at least Mendelssohn's Passacaglia for Organ is in c minor too, and the respective of Reger too.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Avoid any passacaglias by Kapsberger.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Hi Naupilus.
What I meant by substantial is that Webern's opus 1 is quite a long piece compared to what followed and his use of compression. It's almost like that piece stands at a crossroads, and he went in a different direction than we might have anticipated. It's also like a 'graduation' piece for his opus 1, using an old form to underpin a piece for orchestra.
The opus 2 after that is a wonderful 3 minute choral piece.
I certainly don't mean it in a qualitative way, as if to say it's a more rewarding piece, simply the length. A passacaglia is normally a fairly lengthy piece of course because it requires a certain number of repetitions of an 8 bar theme say. I think the Webern is about 12 minutes if my memory serves.
I too have the Webern boxed set with Boulez. Our collections at times look remarkably similar! Like you I do admire his use of compression.
For me some of his choral works in his output are really strong - The Light of The Eye and the Two Cantatas, and the short work opus 2.
Regards
Mark
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Concerning Bach's Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, for me the greatest of them all, though I too admire Webern's:
One extraordinary aspect of it that seems worth mentioning: it is sometimes called Passacaglia and Fugue, and sometimes just Passacaglia. Both titles are correct because, amazingly (please excuse use of this word), in the second part Bach manages to write a fugue which is still a passacaglia. The fugue subject (the same as the passacaglia) is maintained continuously throughout - a real tour de force. And yet there is no feeling of dry, academic achievement, quite the contrary. One reason why I love Bach above all other composers!
Chris A.Gnostic
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
- Biber's for Solo Violin (in g minor too) and the one in the last of the "Mystery Sonatas" for Violin and B.C.: Some of the best and very demanding as well inspiring music written for the violin.
Parla
How could I have forgotten Biber? Yes, absolutely, his is glorious. The Mystery Sonatas as a whole are magnificent -- I've learned more about the violin from them than I have from Bach's solo violin work.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Let's not exaggerate, mussessein. Biber was a great violinist of his time and a pioneer of the great school of violin, while Bach was a great (for quite a few the greatest) musician. So, his Solo Violin Works are primarily "musical" works and then "violin" ones, providing, at the same time, superb writing for the violin as well.
Biber is still a well kept secret to many, despite there are quite a few and very good recordings of his works.
Chris, you are very precise in your brief analysis of the greatest Passacaglia of all. I love Bach but along with at least Haydn, Mozart, Schubert and Wagner. The reason is that, despite Bach said it all, some others (like at least the ones I mentioned) said that little "additional new", but in an indelibly glorious way.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Concerning Bach's Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, for me the greatest of them all, though I too admire Webern's:
One extraordinary aspect of it that seems worth mentioning: it is sometimes called Passacaglia and Fugue, and sometimes just Passacaglia. Both titles are correct because, amazingly (please excuse use of this word), in the second part Bach manages to write a fugue which is still a passacaglia. The fugue subject (the same as the passacaglia) is maintained continuously throughout - a real tour de force. And yet there is no feeling of dry, academic achievement, quite the contrary. One reason why I love Bach above all other composers!
Chris, not being a Bach expert I had to look through itunes to see if I had the passacaglia. I seem to have the d'Albert transcription and Herrick playing it on the organ. Both will go to the top of the playlist this week.
Thanks for all the other comments. I swing wildly in the level of my admiration for Brahms but certainly the passcaglia is one movement I always enjoy.
Naupilus
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive


The finale of the fourth symphony of Brahms is a superb example: thirty variations on a theme from one of Bach's cantatas.
GWP