I just can't get into Bruckner

126 replies [Last post]
lilianruhe
lilianruhe's picture
Offline
Joined: 18th Feb 2012
Posts: 19
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

You know better (what TedR means, what TedR wants to say, what actually is happening around TedR's world and so on).

__________________
parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2094
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

If I am wrong, TedR will correct me. Fortunately, in your case none will.

Parla

lilianruhe
lilianruhe's picture
Offline
Joined: 18th Feb 2012
Posts: 19
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

In the Queen's English 'quality' has a lot of meanings, not just the one you're obsessed with.

__________________
parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2094
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

Ah, bon! Now, we can communicate. I guess you didn't mean the social status of Bruckner's music, Lilian.

Parla

 

tjh212@yahoo.com
tjh212@yahoo.com's picture
Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2010
Posts: 41
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

Karajan's recording Mahler for commercial reasons has been documented in "A Life in Music". The book also describes him trying to skip some measures in Mahler 6 for the recording.

I name humor in Bruckner as the trio section in the 9th - reminds me of kittens running around

TedR
TedR's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 144
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

Some of the comments in this thread may have been addressing whether Bruckner was a great composer (which I think he was). But many of the entries (from several contributors) are simply related to whether Karajan was "pro-Bruckner/anti-Mahler" and Bernstein was sort of the opposite. That is all I was responding to. In simplistic terms (without going into detail about what "pro" and "anti" might mean) the statement doesn't seem to me to be wrong. 

Ted

c hris johnson
c hris johnson's picture
Online
Joined: 8th Sep 2010
Posts: 795
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

I agree with you Ted, and perhaps one should add the more general point that the qualities required for a great Bruckner conductor are not at all the same as for Mahler, which doesn't of course preclude some conductors being superb in both.

I just wanted briefly to add how much I agree with your description of Bruckner's music in your carefully written post above Ganymede.

If I haven't contributed anything much to this thread it is not for lack of interest.  This week I've listened to three of his symphonies, the string quintet (IMO, better than Parla argues, somewhat less so than you believe, 50m), and the Te Deum. So the thread can't be so bad!

Chris

__________________

Chris A.Gnostic

jesserj
jesserj's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2010
Posts: 25
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

I hated Bruckner's symphonies for many years until finally I decided to give them a chance.  I started with the 4th symphony called the "Romantic" which sounds good at least.  It does have some nice melodies at least.  I played it about three times in a week.  I began to like it and went on to the 7th.  Same thing happened,  More melodies even though they do not seem to last very long.  By this time I decided to buy the von Karajan box of Bruckner and also the Tintner.  I can say that I now do not get thrown by Bruckner'a music. Some of it is very religious in nature and can be very exciting.  I would also suggest playing them as loudly as your equipment and/or family permit.  Sometimes some music critics have stated that the Bruckner orchestra sounds like one huge organ.  Anyway, I hope you give it a try and hope we have been helpful.

eyeresist
eyeresist's picture
Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2010
Posts: 113
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

c hris johnson wrote:
the string quintet (IMO, better than Parla argues, somewhat less so than you believe, 50m)

For me, the problem with the quintet is that it is a quintet! I wish it was scored for full orchestra, and twice as long. As it is, with what I know of Bruckner's language, it sounds like a sketch.

There is an arrangement of the quintet for string orchestra (I mean as distinct from the arrangement of the adagio). It was recorded by Marriner, but that seems to be NA. There's also a recording by Zagrosek on Orfeo (I think; the Amazon record is unclear).

EDIT: According to abruckner.com, there are also recordings by Schneidt and Ryker. Schneidt is on AmazonUK as an MP3.

__________________

'Art doesn't need philosophers. It just needs to communicate from soul to soul.' Alejandro Jodorowsky

50milliarden
50milliarden's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2012
Posts: 188
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

eyeresist wrote:

c hris johnson wrote:
the string quintet (IMO, better than Parla argues, somewhat less so than you believe, 50m)

For me, the problem with the quintet is that it is a quintet! I wish it was scored for full orchestra, and twice as long. As it is, with what I know of Bruckner's language, it sounds like a sketch.

I think the problem is we all discovered the String Quartet at the end of our journey through Bruckner's works, when his saturated orchestral colors already have defined our verdict of his style. Of course if you go that road, the Quintet will sound monochromous. We don't percieve this style clash when dealing with Schubert's, Mozart's or Brahms' quintets since we accept their works as part of their chamber music canon. But Bruckner's quintet is a stand-alone and the only thing (apart from an early quartet which is little more than a study work) we CAN compare it to are the symphonies, and specifically the 6th and 7th, since it originated from that period.

But let's imagine someone who doesn't know Bruckner at all and the first work he hears is the String Quintet. The thought that it's "colorless" or even "sketchy" wouldn't enter his mind. Of course there are certain passages where Bruckner calls for an orchestral sound that his five players can't possibly deliver (like the codas of the first and 4th movements), but the overall majority of the music is concieved in a perfectly idiomatic chamber music style. And if we're to condemn orchestral effects in chamber music, we can't ignore that Brahms, for instance, was a much bigger "offender" in this field, specially in his earlier works, where more than one planned symphony ended up as a chamber music piece. See the first piano quartet, which sounds much more like it's written with a full orchestra in mind than Bruckner's quintet (it was orchestrated by Schönberg for that very reason).

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2094
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

Very fine analysis, 50m, but not many will agree with you. Brahms 1st Piano Quartet is a masterpiece of Chamber Music and very well established in the repertory. Bruckner's String Quintet needs a bit more time...

Parla

c hris johnson
c hris johnson's picture
Online
Joined: 8th Sep 2010
Posts: 795
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

Curious, all these transcriptions of chamber works for orchestra.  I suppose it started with Schönberg and his own Verklärte Nacht and then Brahms' Piano Quartet. Then, inauthentic Korngold Sextet, Weingartner's Beethoven Quartets and Grosse Fuge arrangements etc. Perhaps the proliferation arises from the decline in domestic playing of chamber music.  To my ears the originals always sound preferable, but I know many prefer the orchestral version of Verklärte Nacht: at least that is authentic Schönberg. 

Schönberg's arrangement of the Brahms has sometimes been justified on the grounds that Brahms was exploring material for a first symphony he was not yet ready to compose. Be that as it may, however symphonic some of the ideas are, the scoring for piano quartet seems to me as close to perfection as one could ever hope to hear.  My grandfather had the 78s with Serkin and the Busch Quartet - never to be forgotten! Schönberg's superb 'version' sounds to me like - er, Schönberg. 

I've never heard the Bruckner Quintet arranged for full strings, but can't imagine I'd find it an improvement.

Chris

 

__________________

Chris A.Gnostic

50milliarden
50milliarden's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2012
Posts: 188
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

Going through my Bruckner discography I realized some symphonies (specially the 2nd and 8th) were rather underrepresented in my collection, with only 2 or 3 recordings to choose from. So I got my hands on these cd's, following some recommendations on this forum and elsewhere (haven't listened to them yet, will do next week):

- 2nd: Giulini, VSO (1975). Didn't know this one yet, but it's considered a classic.

- 2nd: Tintner, NSO Ireland (1996). Because of the rare 1872 version.

- 6th: Keilberth, BPO (60's). Never found that definitive recording of my favorite symphony. Could this be the one?

- 7th: Böhm, VPO (1977). Loved Böhm's 3rd and 4th and this one gets praised a lot too.

- 8th: Schuricht, VPO (1963). The fastest 8th in the catalogue.

- 8th: Barbirolli, Hallé O (1970). Love Barbirolli in Mahler, haven't heard him in Bruckner yet.

- 8th: Wand, BPO (2001). Another modern classic.

- String Quintet and Quartet: L'Archibudelli (1994). Only had the Melos Quartet recording so far.

Any thoughts on these performances?

EDIT: I also heard good things about Horst Stein's 6th with the VPO. Worth getting?

 

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2094
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

For all it's worth (at least for you, 50m), the String Quintet exists in at least 10 available recordings and the String Quartet in about half of them. I own the following, which are all very safe bets:

1. Prazak Quartet and Jan Talich on Praga.

2. Raphael Ensemble on Hyperion (now on Helios).

3. Amadeus Quartet on DG

4. Brandis Quartet on Nimbus (with Brahms op111!).

5. Leipziger Str. Qu. on MDG

6. Fina Arts Str. Qu. on Naxos

The last two include the String Quartet too. The latter has been recorded on SACD by Quintone along with the neglected one by Rott.

Parla

lilianruhe
lilianruhe's picture
Offline
Joined: 18th Feb 2012
Posts: 19
RE: I just can't get into Bruckner

50milliarden, since you genuinely seem to love the Bruckner-quintet (and rightly so), you really should try to lay your hand on the 1974 Decca-recording with the Vienna Philharmonia Quintet. I own it in a 1991 Decca-rerelease but nowadays it should be available quite cheaply through Australian Eloquence. To me it is the most glowing, yet somehow intimate, of the versions I know and, compared to the Leipziger and Melos Quartets (their second recording – I’m not familiar with their earlier Intercord-recording), the VPQ is able to add two minutes to the Adagio without losing tension. It reminds me of the advice Richard Osborne has often given in Gramophone when discussing Bruckner-symphonies: if you can’t choose between the versions available, just take the one with the Vienna Philharmonic!

__________________