Most important living composer.

127 replies [Last post]
c hris johnson
c hris johnson's picture
Offline
Joined: 8th Sep 2010
Posts: 794
RE: Most important living composer.

Like you Mark I've had a lot of thought-provoking pleasure and only a little irritation from this thread.

So here a final, or nearly-final (who knows?) very personal, provocative opinion:

Like many others I have found the music of many of the composers we have discussed to be interesting, some very interesting, and have derived much pleasure from thgeir music.  But few of them have been quite as satisfying as favourite composers from not long ago.

I look to see why. Structures and forms come ands go. Those used by Bach are very different from Palestrina's, Mozart's than Bach's, etc.  If I examine the structures and analyse the forms of the music of many of my favourite modern composers I see nothing to make me find them inferior to the works of previous generations of composers now considered important. Why then am I less satisfied with what I hear?

You've heard the answer from me before and I will say it again, in spades. MELODY.

For at least a millenium, melody has been at the heart of all music, serious or frivolous.

The melodies existing in most European music written before the 20th century, and popular music throughout the 20th century, featured "fixed and easily discernible frequency patterns", recurring "events, often periodic, at all structural levels" and "recurrence of durations and patterns of durations". (Wikipedia).

So my final question is this. In an understandable attempt to diversify from the regular patterns that they feel restrict their scope have modern composers too often thrown the baby out with the bathwater, or "like the base Indian, thrown a pearl away richer than all his tribe"?

Chris

 

 

__________________

Chris A.Gnostic

Uber Alice
Uber Alice's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2012
Posts: 223
RE: Most important living composer.

c hris johnson wrote:

So my final question is this. In an understandable attempt to diversify from the regular patterns that they feel restrict their scope have modern composers too often thrown the baby out with the bathwater, or "like the base Indian, thrown a pearl away richer than all his tribe.

 

The second world war which totally destroyed europe gave people the idea that if 'civilisation' can lead us to this, then we need a complete rethink. This idea effected classical music more than most arts as the 'german' tradition was so strong. The post war period also saw a huge rise in the leasure activities of the 'working class' who have never been interested in classical music. Minimalism is post war working class shopping mall music.

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2093
RE: Most important living composer.

After a very hectic and not so pleasant day, I see the thread is again on fire, with a quite a few issues raised and of my concern. Going the opposite way, Chris comes first:

You are very open-minded and kind to admit you find pleasure in something which has been not "quite as satisfying as favourite composers from not long ago". I find too some contemporary composers' works interesting, very few quite interesting, but only as listening experience. Since I'm not satisfied with the musical form, structure, harmony (or lack of it), dissonances (most of the time incredibly difficult to justify) and, of course, the lack of any sort of melody, I cannot call either the works or the composers worthy of the tradition, even the most recent one.

Besides, Bach, in his different structure and form, developed further (up to the way of codification) what previous composers have achieved, in a continuously evolving phase of the Classical Music. The same applies to Mozart compared to Bach (whom, by the way, he admired most and he modelled or devoted works or movements of his works to the Master: see the second movement of the Violin Sonata in e minor, K.304). So, the difference between the composers of the "tradition" (which, practically ends with Shostakovich) and the more modern/contemporary along with the ones who had already decided to "go astray" lies in the break-up, in  one or the other way, with the continuation of the Music as we knew (and love and appreciate) it. The melody was the first and most obvious victim, but what about these clusters of dissonant even cacophonous sounds, the extreme sonorities, the over-stretched form, the almost or most of the time self-justified structure, etc.?

Finally, since you are so interested on Lachenmann's String Quartets, please note that there is a very fine new recording (on SACD) with the Athena Quartet, on the label specialised on contemporary music, namely the NEOS. On the same label, you may find also the Complete Quartets of Kurtag and of Georg Katzer, all of them on brilliant SACD. As I said, I may find interesting some contemporary music (as a consistent collector, I listen to as much music as possible), but I cannot call it Classic...

Good hunting and eventual listening, (if you must).

Parla

 

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2093
RE: Most important living composer.

Mark, if you don't get why "Beethoven's use of form is brilliant" and Lutoslawski's not so, based on the issue of fact versus opinion, you have to ask yourself whether there is a basis on which someone can pronounce his opinion on the form of a composition in Classical Music. If there is a basis to rely upon (and you know there is), then, your opinion on the form of Beethoven's or Lutoslavski's works can be made. So, if everything is a matter of opinion, then, we should not worry about anything. There is no greatness in form or in anything else. Anything goes and we are all happy with whatever we simply like.

As for the "experiment", please kindly note: it didn't happen only once and only by me. It occurs, on various occasions with friends and professors (in teaching workshops) as an example of instant and obvious reactions, when someone is stripped of any prejudice, knowledge in advance, pre-lecture (and pre-influence). The people involved have been individuals of very young age, who seem to have interest in music in general, aspiring talents, who have not the means to go further (mostly in Africa and in some parts in Asia) and some who have no interest in Classical Music at all. The listening was based on no pre-information on composers, recordings, etc (which would have been of no or minimal use to most of them, anyway).

As for my "factual inaccuracies"...: Boulez recordings are not as many as one should expect for a composer of 66 years of activity. As he is not prolific, he proved to be less influential and interesting even for the major labels and artists (e.g. see who has performed his Complete Piano Sonatas and on which label or his supposed "masterpiece" pli selon pli). For the performances of Turangalila, I will respond to the author of the post in question. Regarding Lutoslawski's 3rd in Berlin, please Mark and Chris note that this is only the second performance in the city (with the BPO) since 1985, when it has been performed by the composer himself! By the way, Chris, don't see only the "three starred  items" of the BPO Digital Concert Hall. Check the whole year's regular schedule and you'll see which is (still) the main thrust of the institution. The modern stuff are either fill-ups or marginal or individual concerts, mostly by guest artists (Aimard, etc.).

Finally, the "widespread success of Gorecki's 3rd" was indeed a (one-time) "surprising thing". Indeed! Temporary and not that influential (no continuation of successfully selling recordings or become an established regular piece in the repertory).

Parla

partsong
partsong's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Aug 2010
Posts: 585
RE: Most important living composer.

Hi Parla!

Did I tell you the story of the Mexican Pupeteer?

(I haf deleted thees story due to representation by the Mehican Pupeteer's agent.)

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2093
RE: Most important living composer.

DST, I checked the relevant site you mentioned for the performances of the "Turangalila". What is important is not how many times it has been performed, but in what kind of performances.

In 2011, there is only a strong one with Previn and Momo Kodama (a very good exponent of Mesiaen's Piano Music, indeed) in Tokyo with NHK. The rest is in Canada and in Mainz/Germany.

In 2013, there is scheduled the most important with Jansons and Thibaudet in Munich and Paris (in one performance each). The rest is in marginal US (Seatle) or Germany (Weimar, Frankfurt) and in London with the Royal College of Music S.O.

In 2012, there are the Proms and a tour in Germany's several cities of the same performance with a second rate Orchestra, the Junge Deutsche Philharmonie, under Kristian Jarvi. The rest (Luxemburg, Japan/Hiroshima, Mexico, Colombia (!), Spain/Castilla y Leon, Us/Miami and Finland/Tampere) are routine local performances of limited impact.

The issue is when, for example, it can be performed (and recorded) in Berlin by BPO or in Vienna by VPO or in London by LSO or in NY by NYPO, etc. and by various major conductors.

Finally, whether you wish to believe it or not, I never claimed I am based in Berlin. However, because of my profession, I have lived there for about 4 and half years (2003-2007). If you read my posts, I have said I have lived also in China (my wife is Chinese). I have also lived in US (in the years of Clinton administration) and I am involved now in some projects in some parts of sub-Saharan Africa. I'm not cosmopolitan and the only "pseudo" is my pseudonyme. As for Berlin and Germany, I love them both and, whenever I can, I return there. During my years there, I attended (and spent a small fortune) quite a few concerts of every kind (not only in Philharmonie), but also in the neighbouring Leipzig, Dresden, Hamburg and, occasionaly in Koln and Frankfurt. Of course, Berlin is a "forward-looking vibrant city" and German culture is definitely "musically vital" but, I can assure you based most predominantly on tradition.

The reason I mentioned to some posters about their "yard" (not necessarily  the backyard) is only because they often reach their conclusions based only and exclusively on what happens in UK and sometimes only in London.

Finally, since I didn't "touch" your ears, leave my "anatomically tricky" nose aside. This is an internet forum; we don't have anything to lose or much more to gain. (Incidentally, your today's post #13 was at least cheap and unworthy of you joke. Anyway, at least you urged us to blame your "tenuous hold on reality").

Parla

P.S.: Are you German, by the way. Your pseudonym directs me there. What a bold and imaginative name: Der Teufel?..Warum...oder...warum nicht?

 

Arbutus
Arbutus's picture
Offline
Joined: 3rd Jun 2010
Posts: 62
RE: Most important living composer.

Evaluating the worth of a piece of music based on the frequency with which it is performed is a specious form of judgement. For example, if I leave the music of our time and go to music from over 400 years ago and look at a composition by Tomas Luis de Victoria it will help me make my point. His  first Missa Pro defunctis (published in Rome in 1583), written for four voices, is hardly ever performed now, while the later Missa Pro defunctis of 1605 tends to be performed quite regularly. Does that make the earlier work any less wonderful? Does the mere fact of its existence not give it a validity which is beyond question? Is the frequency, or infrequency, of performance of this, or any other piece of music, merely a reflection of the whims and fashions of this era (not to mention the pernicious workings of the marketplace)? 

CraigM
CraigM's picture
Offline
Joined: 2nd Oct 2010
Posts: 198
RE:

parla wrote:
As for the "experiment", please kindly note: it didn't happen only once and only by me.

The point I was making about the so-called ‘experiment’ was that it demonstrated absolutely nothing, other than some music is more immediately accessible than others. It does not, as you suggest, illustrate that Boulez (for example) represents a ‘degradation and alienation’ of the standards set by Bach. Yet again a statement which has no basis in fact.

parla wrote:
Finally, the "widespread success of Gorecki's 3rd" was indeed a (one-time) "surprising thing". Indeed! Temporary and not that influential (no continuation of successfully selling recordings or become an established regular piece in the repertory).

Again, you purposefully avoid the point I was making. The phenomenal success of Gorecki 3 is an objective rebuttal of your argument that contemporary music cannot command the popularity of more traditional forms of classical music. It might have been a one-off, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen

 

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2093
RE: Most important living composer.

Arbutus, the reason there was some extensive exchanges on the frequency of the performances of certain works of contemporary composers was not to justify or deal exclusively with the "worth of the piece of music". It has to do with how influential or significant is a modern work (a work of our times) for the audiences it is supposed to address.This factor indicates how well the work is received and accepted; it shows its function and, to some extent, its worth in the world of Classical Music.

The example with the two Missae Pro Defunctis by Victoria is not a quite relevant one to our case. Old music is to be discovered by those who are interested. Their value has been established, whether they are going to be performed frequently or not. Bach's Art of Fugue is not for everyday performance and it cannot be played anywhere. However, it is a well-known, established masterpiece of reference.

However, when we talk about contemporary composers, the frequency and the level of performances, the amount of recordings and how they sell (in any possible form), the impact on the media of the Classical Music and their followers are all elements which, in one way or another, count to assess the actual worth and value of a work in its development in becoming an established work, let alone an established modern masterpiece. The same applies, grosso modo, for the contemporary composers. Take Gorecki's Third, for example: the media and the "establishment" promoted it, in its first recording on Nonesuch, back some good years ago. It managed to become a sort of modern Classic. However, afterwards...There followed about ten other recordings, which almost failed to sell; the live performances? Not such a success story. So, what is the impact (and the fate) of the work as such, beyond the whichever pure musical value?

Craig, with the "experiment" I didn't try to prove anything. The whole "project" indicated that, people who have nothing to do with Classical Music, demonstrated an alienation for this music. In some cases, this alienation reached the levels of repulsion, which is something that goes beyond the issue of accessibility of some sort of music. The degradation has to do with whether one can accept what had been defined as "standards" (or "rules", etc.) to identify what Bach, for example, had set as such and Boulez respected.

For Gorecki's Third, as long as we agree it was a "one-off", I'm fine with that. There have been and will always be exceptions.

Parla

 

CraigM
CraigM's picture
Offline
Joined: 2nd Oct 2010
Posts: 198
RE:

parla wrote:
Craig, with the "experiment" I didn't try to prove anything. The whole "project" indicated that, people who have nothing to do with Classical Music, demonstrated an alienation for this music. In some cases, this alienation reached the levels of repulsion, which is something that goes beyond the issue of accessibility of some sort of music. The degradation has to do with whether one can accept what had been defined as "standards" (or "rules", etc.) to identify what Bach, for example, had set as such and Boulez respected.

Whether you wanted to prove or indicate something, you certainly did niether. All this shows is that the people didn't like what they heard - it doesn't mean the music wasn't any good. Nor does it show that the standards established by Bach have been degraded. This is a purely subjective statement on your part and you have said nothing which warrants making such a foolish remark.

 

partsong
partsong's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Aug 2010
Posts: 585
RE: Most important living composer.

Golden mediocrities...minimal interest...Adams is trivial, Boulez is incomprehensible...no influential figures...rarely performed limited success...Boulez did not develop his language...important goes with influential...I don't deal with any of my preferences...I don't see any of the composers can leave their indelible mark for the next generations...I don't find enough features in anyone to make them worthy of the title of the most important...lower and more indifferent music...degradation and alienation...composers who betray their art...who lead it astray...

...apart from Bernstein, Sondheim and Piazzola...

I think I've got the picture Parla. Now we are asked to believe that unless the work is performed frequently by the top four orchestras in the world and sells in multiples the work is insignificant.

Parla, as a traditionalist ok you have exercised your right to an opinion on this thread, as I also have done as more of a modernist than you. With respect I would say to you that your opinion is not always shared by others. Those of us who are interested in talking about modern/contemporary music will hopefully continue to do so.

Mark

c hris johnson
c hris johnson's picture
Offline
Joined: 8th Sep 2010
Posts: 794
RE: Most important living composer.

Last night I listened to a sequence of french vocal works.  First Les Nuits d'Ete (Berlioz), then Sheherazade (Ravel), then Poemes pour Mi (Messiaen), finally Le Marteau sans Maitre (Boulez). [Sorry, no accents]. I was astonished at how one notices the continuum in style, especially of the vocal lines.  And the most obvious, biggest, 'gap' in style between the works was not (for me) where expected.

It makes an interesting programme.

Chris

__________________

Chris A.Gnostic

guillaume
guillaume's picture
Offline
Joined: 11th Oct 2010
Posts: 131
RE: Most important living composer.

c hris johnson wrote:

Guillaume: "I'm not sure what you mean by "middle ground" but most new works I've heard in the 21st century, a few "modern" gestures apart, could have been written any time in the last hundred years. I almost prefer the prevailing situation 30 or 40 years ago, when any new work performed at a mainstream concert could be guaranteed to set the audience's teeth on edge."

 Interesting comment Guillaume. I suppose the clue is the word 'living'. Most of us have selected older living composers.  I suspect you are thinking of composers active in the 21st century?  Who do you have in mind particularly?

Everybody I've heard, including composers born as late as the 1980s. There's no avant garde, that I know of, any more. Which makes for a very dull situation, especially when there are apparently no great composers of any description. To rephrase the subject of this thread; which composers' new works do you eagerly look forward to? How many new works are you even aware of? Substitute "conductors" or "artists" for "composers" and "recordings" for "works" and I think the response might be more fruitful. The rise of the conductor, in particular, signalled the demise of the composer.

__________________
Uber Alice
Uber Alice's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2012
Posts: 223
RE: Most important living composer.

guillaume wrote:
The rise of the conductor, in particular, signalled the demise of the composer.

Although there is some truth in this ( We almost get Bernstein's Mahler 6th or Rattle's Beethoven 5th put forward as 'new works' because of the interpetation of the conductor.) If we have new Mahler works and new Beethoven works every year then what chance do new composers have. However it is rather over egging the pudding. Did Mahler find the rise of the conductor unhelpful to composing. He funded his composing by conducting. Maybe the composer and the conductor need to be brought back into the same world as each other. When the 20th century avant garde composer locked himself in his ivory tower and declared he no longer needed anyone but himself and that the past, the performance and the public were unimportant to his little artistic soul, what did he expect. The 20th century avant garde composer was never as important as he thought he was. Thank god we are now in the 21st century. I just hope the public can forgive and forget.

Ian Paternoster
Ian Paternoster's picture
Offline
Joined: 13th Apr 2011
Posts: 57
RE: Most important living composer.

Composer, conductor, and creative thinker - John Adams occupies a unique position in the world of American music. His works, both operatic and symphonic, stand out among contemporary classical compositions for their depth of expression, brilliance of sound, and the profoundly humanist nature of their themes. Over the past 25 years, Adams’ music has played a decisive role in turning the tide of contemporary musical aesthetics away from academic modernism and toward a more expansive, expressive language, entirely characteristic of his New World surroundings.

Born and raised in New England, Adams learned the clarinet from his father and played in marching bands and community orchestras during his formative years. He began composing at age ten and heard his first orchestral pieces performed while still a teenager. The intellectual and artistic traditions of New England, including his studies at Harvard University and attendance at Boston Symphony Orchestra concerts, helped shape him as an artist and thinker. After earning two degrees from Harvard, he moved to Northern California in 1971 and has since lived in the San Francisco Bay area.

Adams taught at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music for ten years before becoming composer-in-residence of the San Francisco Symphony (1982-85), and creator of the orchestra’s highly successful and controversial "New and Unusual Music" series. Several of Adams’ landmark orchestral works were written for and premiered by the San Francisco Symphony, including Harmonium (1980-81), Grand Pianola Music (1982), Harmonielehre (1984-85), and El Dorado (1991).

In 1985, Adams began a collaboration with the poet Alice Goodman and stage director Peter Sellars that resulted in two groundbreaking operas: Nixon in China (1987) and The Death of Klinghoffer (1991). Produced worldwide, these works are among the most performed operas of the last two decades. Four further stage collaborations with Sellars followed: the 1995 "songplay", I Was Looking at the Ceiling and Then I Saw the Sky, with a libretto by June Jordan; El Niño (2000), a multilingual retelling of the nativity story; Doctor Atomic (2005), about J. Robert Oppenheimer and the creation of the first atomic bomb; and A Flowering Tree, inspired by Mozart’s Magic Flute and premiered in Vienna in 2006.

Nixon in China receives its Metropolitan Opera debut in February of 2011 in six performances the Sellars production conducted by the composer, including a worldwide live telecast on February 12th.

Other signal Adams works that have become repertory with orchestras, choruses and ensembles include Shaker Loops for strings, The Dharma at Big Sur (a concerto for electric violin inspired by the

writings of Jack Kerouac), Doctor Atomic Symphony (a 22-minute symphony drawn from the opera), Violin Concerto, Chamber Symphony and Son of Chamber Symphony (choreographed as Joyride by Mark Morris).

City Noir, a 35-minute symphonic work inspired by "noir" films of the Forties and Fifties, was premiered by the Los Angeles Philharmonic under Gustavo Dudamel in October of 2009 and toured throughout the country the following spring.

Absolute Jest

, Adams’ most recently

completed work commissioned to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the San Francisco Symphony, is scored for orchestra and solo string quartet and is based on scherzo fragments from late Beethoven quartets.

Harvard University has twice honored Adams with significant awards: in 2004 he received the Centennial Medal of the university’s Graduate School of Arts and Sciences "for contributions to society," and in 2007 he received the Harvard Arts Medal. He has received from Northwestern University both the 2004 Michael Ludwig Nemmers Prize in Music Composition (the first ever awarded) and in 2008 an honorary doctorate. Honored with a proclamation by governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California for his distinguished service to the arts in his adopted

home state, he has also been awarded an honorary doctorate by the University of Cambridge and an honorary membership in Phi Beta Kappa. He was honored by his home city of Berkeley, California, for his sixtieth birthday. He was also a 2009 recipient of the NEA Opera Awards.

John Adams is an active conductor, appearing with the world’s greatest orchestras in programs combining his own works with a wide variety of repertoire. In past seasons, he has conducted the New York Philharmonic, Cleveland Orchestra, Chicago Symphony Orchestra, New World Symphony, San Francisco Symphony, Atlanta Symphony Orchestra, the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra, and London Symphony Orchestra, among others. He conducted the National Symphony in Washington DC in a two-week residency in May of 2010 and returned to the San Francisco Symphony later that year as part of an eight concert focus on his music led by himself and by music director Michael Tilson Thomas. In 2011 in addition to conducting Nixon in China at the Metropolitan Opera he leads concerts with the Juilliard Orchestra at Carnegie Hall, the New World Symphony and the Toronto Symphony.

Adams has also received critical acclaim for his creative programming. In 2003, Lincoln Center presented a festival titled "John Adams: An American Master", the most extensive festival that the venue has ever devoted to a living composer. As the Richard and Barbara Debs Composer’s Chair at Carnegie Hall from 2003-07, Adams conducted the first public concert in Carnegie’s Zankel Hall and founded the annual "In Your Ear" festival. In 2006, he curated the hugely popular "Minimalist Jukebox" and "West Coast/Left Coast" festivals for the Los Angeles Philharmonic. He is a frequent guest with both the London Symphony Orchestra and the BBC Symphony at London’s Barbican Centre and the BBC Proms at Albert Hall. He is currently the Creative Chair for the Los Angeles Philharmonic.

In 1985, Nonesuch Records released Adams’

Harmonielehre, a landmark recording of American symphonic music. Since then, Nonesuch has released first recordings of all of his works, both symphonic and theatrical. Nonesuch’s ten-disc set, The John Adams Earbox, documents his recorded music through 2000.

Adams’ music plays a dynamic role in the highly acclaimed Tilda Swinton film "I Am Love," directed by Luca Guadagnino. His music has also been used in films by Martin Scorsese and Barbet Schroeder.

In addition to being a composer and conductor John Adams is also a productive and provocative writer. He maintains a popular blog about music and literature called "Hell and

Mouth," and his writings have appeared in The New Yorker, the New York Times Book Review and the Times of London. "Hallejulah Junction" – Adams’ volume of memoirs and commentary on American musical life – appeared in 2008, by Farrar, Straus & Giroux in the U.S., and by Faber & Faber in the U.K The book won the Northern California Book Award for Creative Nonfiction and was named one of the "most notable books of the year" by The New York Times.

__________________

A painter paints pictures on canvas. But musicians paint their pictures on silence. ~Leopold Stokowski.

Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life. ~Berthold Auerbach.

Music is the poetry of the air. ~Richter.