Most Underrated, Forgotten, and Neglected Masterpieces
Definitely, Liszt is not and cannot be called a "second rate" composer. Maybe, those who call him as such are "second rate" listeners.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Definitely, Liszt is not and cannot be called a "second rate" composer. Maybe, those who call him as such are "second rate" listeners.
Parla
For once I am full agreement with you.
Rather twenty minutes of inspired, if bombastic, piano concerto than two hours of declamatory, if pompous, vocal music!
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Very well said, Troyen.
However, what do you have in mind as "declamatory, if pompous, vocal music"?
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Very well said, Troyen.
However, what do you have in mind as "declamatory, if pompous, vocal music"?
Parla
Oh, come on. Liszt was related to him by marriage and treated appallingly by him.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Oh, come on. Liszt was related to him by marriage and treated appallingly by him.
Bülow?
frostwalrus
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I think Troyen means the great Wagner (whom he knows I admire most).
However, to call this unique mind's music "declamatory, if pompous, vocal music" is a very superficial reading of his great Opus. Anyway, Wagner's music is much more than Vocal, Choral or Symphonic; it is the Gesamtkunstwerk (the total or comprehensive art work). Some analysts in the past have called his "works" huge Symphonies with voices. What they practically wanted to say is that the voices (soloists or Chorus) are part of the whole score with equal value of presence.
Finally, the influence of Wagner to his contemporaries (see Bruckner, Mahler, Pfitzner, etc.) and mostly to practically any composer of the future (R. Strauss, Shostakovich, Respighi, etc.), in one or the other way and to a high or not degree, indicates that his music was much more than declamatory or pompous.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Oh, come on. Liszt was related to him by marriage and treated appallingly by him.
Bülow?
I don't think Liszt and Bulow were related by marriage but did have one thing in common in that they crossed paths with the self-important monster of Western Art music.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I think Troyen means the great Wagner (whom he knows I admire most).
However, to call this unique mind's music "declamatory, if pompous, vocal music" is a very superficial reading of his great Opus. Anyway, Wagner's music is much more than Vocal, Choral or Symphonic; it is the Gesamtkunstwerk (the total or comprehensive art work). Some analysts in the past have called his "works" huge Symphonies with voices. What they practically wanted to say is that the voices (soloists or Chorus) are part of the whole score with equal value of presence.
Finally, the influence of Wagner to his contemporaries (see Bruckner, Mahler, Pfitzner, etc.) and mostly to practically any composer of the future (R. Strauss, Shostakovich, Respighi, etc.), in one or the other way and to a high or not degree, indicates that his music was much more than declamatory or pompous.
Parla
Total or comprehensive art works are they? Where's the dance, for a start?
Personally, I prefer my symphonies huge but to last a tad less than 3 hours.
I always wondered why Pfitzner was crap for the most part, now I know.
The others that you cite merely improved on the source, although it would be interesting to know where you find the influences in Shostakovich.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I always wondered why Pfitzner was crap for the most part, now I know.
Most part?
JKH
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I always wondered why Pfitzner was crap for the most part, now I know.
Most part?
There's a disc of orchesterlieder sung by Begemann with the Nordwestdeutsche Philhamonie under Tausk on CPO and his violin concerto is worth the occasional airing.
I've come across nothing else of note, as yet.
Final part of Maria de Rudenz.
This, I can hear, will only end in tears.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Oh, come on. Liszt was related to him by marriage and treated appallingly by him.
Bülow?
I don't think Liszt and Bulow were related by marriage but did have one thing in common in that they crossed paths with the self-important monster of Western Art music.
Just for information, Bulow was married to Liszt's daughter Cosima. She then began an affair with Wagner and eventually ended up marrying Wagner. Liszt was no a happy father in law with either - Bulow, while a great pianist and conductor, suffered from bouts of depression and Wagner spent most of his time asking his father in law for handouts and very seldom had the decency to say thank you. Liszt's part in Wagner's escape from imprisonment (and probable execution) is great, so if we really want to blame anybody for Wagner's music is could easily be Liszt :-)
Naupilus
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I'm not surprised if you call Wagner "the self-important monster of Western Art music, provided you "only end in tears" after listening Maria di Rudenz. It's pity, but it's a fact (for you), I admit. However, there is a huge variety of people since the appearance of Wagner who thought and keep thinking otherwise.
As for Pfitzner, there is enough Chamber Music and a group of Lieder worth exploring.
For Shostakovich, just explore his orchestration, his direct quote of the Funeral March of "Gotterdammerung" in the final movement of Symphony no. 15 and so on.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I'm not surprised if you call Wagner "the self-important monster of Western Art music, provided you "only end in tears" after listening Maria di Rudenz. It's pity, but it's a fact (for you), I admit. However, there is a huge variety of people since the appearance of Wagner who thought and keep thinking otherwise.
As for Pfitzner, there is enough Chamber Music and a group of Lieder worth exploring.
For Shostakovich, just explore his orchestration, his direct quote of the Funeral March of "Gotterdammerung" in the final movement of Symphony no. 15 and so on.
Parla
You fall for it every single time.
Mind you, whether I've expressed my true feelings towards Wagner or not, one thing I do treat as a sport is winding up Wagnerites who take their hero oh-so seriously and cannot see beyond him or his music which as somebody once said is not as bad as it sounds.
I've told you time and time again I have no time for chamber music.
I cannot comprehend your last sentence as you have already stated that you prefer his first piano concerto and I recommended Tahiti Trot, which you quickly Googled.
As Beecham might have said I will swap Die Ring for operas like Maria de Rudenz and feel I'd done better out of the deal!
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Troyen, I didn't dare to tell you before that when I came across the Donizetti on the ORF site, that I posted you about, I was actually looking for something quite different, Thielemann in the Wagner Ring from the Staatsoper, being broadcast this week and next. By the way, no dance in Wagner? Try Die Meistersinger Act III (Dance of the Apprentices).
Chris A.Gnostic
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive


The Piano Concerto is a huge, strange work of brilliance and silliness, but if you allow it to grow on you it is also great fun. bank po coaching
Liszt - Bagatelle without tonality. The title says it all; Liszt
deserves more credit than he will ever be given. Easy to call him second
rate - but how many second rate composers left this much first rate
music.
Best diet plan