Rattle Replacement

42 posts / 0 new
Last post
Rattle Replacement

So the Rattle has announced he is off........Any guesses as to who might replace him?

My thoughts: (1) they will go for someone fairly young as they like to appoint for long periods and prefer long-term stability; (2) must be someone with a decent brand image and recording track record (they won't want to take too many risks); (3) democratic, rather than autocratic in style (they don't like Hitler very much).

My guess: Dudamel (already doing some guest conducting there, very popular if a bit suspect), or (better still) Vladimir Jurowksi (great image, impeccable credentials, does the standard repertoire, family already based in Berlin).

 

RE: Rattle Replacement

I think they might pick Thielemann. Not Dudamel, he's too young still.

RE: Rattle Replacement

No way, ganymede - Thielemann is just too iffy on too many occasions. His pedigree is suspect across the board. Too many duff recordings (wierd tempos, leaden conducting) and duff concerts. He is not going to pack out venues or sell disks around the world. There is nothing remotely exciting or cutting edge about him.

RE: Rattle Replacement

Barenboim must still be a contender. He has a strong presence in Berlin already.

Chris A.Gnostic

RE: Rattle Replacement

Well, I don't know. He's not my favourite conductor, but he does tick many boxes for them. 

Dudamel is much further from their ideals I think.

My personal favourite would be someone like Harding, but he's too young still.

Jurowski is interesting but he's also too young still. And I don't mean only age, I mean professional experience and international reputation. Thielemann is the right professional age and having been a student of Karajan may help a little between the lines.

But who knows...

RE: Rattle Replacement

c hris johnson wrote:

Barenboim must still be a contender. He has a strong presence in Berlin already.

I think he would have been a contender when Rattle got the job, but he's too old now.

RE: Rattle Replacement

Absolutely, Barenboim is far too old. He is seventy NOW, so he'll be seventy-five in 2018 - eighty-five after a standard ten year appointment. No chance. He'll probably be dead by then. Conducting an orchestra isn't the same thing as managing one the size of the BPO: with all the politics, bureaucracy and touring, it is not an old man's job.  

Jurowksi will be 46 in 2018 - that sounds about right for me. (Rattle was 47). Also, he has plenty of experience with top orchestras: LPO, stuff at Glyndbourne, Boston, Philadelphia, major Russian orchestras. You heard it here first.

RE: Rattle Replacement

Dudamel is too young, Barenboim is too old, Jurowski is a good bet..... and what about Gergiev? Chailly is totally out of the question?

RE: Rattle Replacement

Have they thrown their rattle out of the prom.

RE: Rattle Replacement

Speculation is a most favourite sin. It ends up to some unpredictable or odd choices (like poor Rattle's; another golden mediocrity). Anyway, BPO has ceased to be the orchestra of the glorious past; it's just a very good musical engine (of course, most, if not all, of the conductors, nowadays, perform like excellent -at times- musical engineers).

Parla

RE: Rattle Replacement

Let's face it - anyone would be an improvement over fuzzyhead.

Pages

Log in or register to post comments

Gramophone Subscriptions

From £48/year

Gramophone Print

Gramophone Print

no Digital Edition
no Digital Archive
no Reviews Database
no Events & Offers
From £48/year
Subscribe
From £48/year

Gramophone Reviews

Gramophone Reviews

no Print Edition
no Digital Edition
no Digital Archive
no Events & Offers
From £48/year
Subscribe
From £48/year

Gramophone Digital Edition

Gramophone Digital Edition

no Print Edition
no Reviews Database
no Events & Offers
From £48/year
Subscribe
© MA Business and Leisure Ltd. 2014