Searching for God in Classical Music
This "something" can be found in the beauty (the divine, as a reasonable metaphor, according to Vic) of the Music (one of the features on which probably we all agree). The beauty cannot be found in the means (talent of the composer or skills of the musician) but at the end of both, namely the "actual work" and the "listening experience". By all means, the talent and the skills contribute to a high degree to the outcome, but there are other factors, some of them going beyond any means (inspiration, purpose of the composition and of the performance, the role of the audience -in the listening experience- and so on). This "something" (the undefined by definition, I'm afraid) lies sometimes in the work, sometimes in the "listening experience" and, in quite a few blissful occasions, in both. If our appreciation for the outcome was the result of the talent and the skills only, then, I'm afraid the composers' gift and the performers' abilities will end up as pleasurable means to a measurable end.
We may all agree that in "Missa Solemnis" we can trace this "something", this "beauty" (the divine, the metaphor) in the actual work (in the final product of the composer). We may also agree that this "something" is so linked with the work, that, even in a modest performance, can be traced. However, if you put "missa solemnis" as a background music, when you do something else, everything is lost. So, even in cases of "absolute masterworks", we need a relevant "listening experience". We need the "temple" (sorry the space, the venue) where we will house the event.
Maybe you never wonder why and how, in a concert hall, after a good performance of a solid work, everybody, regardless of whether they believe or not there is "something" (in the air), stand up applauding and cheering and , most of time, asking for more. The extraordinary thing is that, despite all the different views, aspirations, understanding of music, social or religious standing, they all feel "something" thrilling in common that unites them and the audience as a whole with the performers. This unbelievable, extraordinary convergance of act (not of views) is an absolute "something", for which we should be thankful, since, in very few (or almost none) occasions, may happen.
Sorry for elaborating so, but I really wish to find this convergance which I trace in all these exchanges of interesting and inspiring "dissonances". I also sincerely hope that, despite we have been lost in some chromatic scale, we may opt for a resolution either in the "tonic major" or even in the "relative major" in the question (in minor) "searching God in classical music". (For the moment, take it as a joke, or a metaphor).
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
(For the moment, take it as a joke, or a metaphor).
It's a joke all right.
-Gary
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
To be precise (the Classical Music should be called, according to Bernstein, as precise music, because what is played, is exactly what is written), I said : (For the moment), take it as a joke or metaphor. That doesnot mean it is a joke. However, if you like it as a joke, I may take it too, despite I may prefer the metaphor, for instance.
And, by all means, "the joke" refers only to the "resolution" matter; the rest of the text stands. So, does the "resolution" as a quest.
All the best, Gary
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I was actually referring to your overheated Messianic rhetoric.
Like I asked before, how about you enjoy the music for whatever reason you consider sufficient, and I'll do the same, okay?
Gary
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I see, Gary, you get more and more aggressive as well as offensive. I never labeled anyone's intervention. So far, all the others have followed this rule of a proper forum's search. So, I think it is expected you should do the same, but so far and you confine yourself to fragmantery and fractional reactions to my analytical argumentation, which, at least by Aligator Dumbarton, has been followed (he shared my train of thoughts), by others (troyen1 and Vic) has created some reaction, but quite legitimate and respectable.
In any case, I urge you to read the Post from the very start (Archduke55 initiated it in a very pertinent and noble way). Read the very well articulated positions of Micos69, Richard33 and Daniel_Marcel. They all tried to contribute to the "quest" for a possible answer. So did I, in a more affirmative and assertive way. If you are a nonbeliever, as you claim, you simply have to dismiss the question, by calling it irrelevant, which is a legitimate reply.
So far, your "pertinent" proposal, after a rather quite good, long and productive exchange of views, is merely to agree on the basis of whatever we may find sufficient in music. So, the music is, after all, "a mesurable end" and the poor performers have to end up to the "pleasurable means" for our enjoyment (by the way, this overheated messianic statement belongs to a significant contemporary composer - to whom? I leave it for your homework).
I remind you that the subject of this Post is whether we may find God in Classical Music. It is not how and why we enjoy or listen to the music. Your response, as a nonbeliever, should be crystal clear. All of us, believers, semi-believers, quasi-believers, semi-atheists, quasi-atheists, we may pursue our quest. By the way, I never said I am a believer; I simply replied, in a chain of analytical thoughts, that God (provided that It can be identified as linked with Faith, Hope and Love) may be found in classical music.
Therefore, dear Gary, we don't have to agree on anything, since you clearly see God in "square circles" and the listenig to the music confines to the "whatever sufficient (reasons or goals) you find there". In our search, we try to identify all these "extra", that we never asked or expected, but we encounter along the way with the "sufficient" (and sometimes even with the "insufficient".
So long,
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I see, Gary, you get more and more aggressive as well as offensive.
I just said you should enjoy music for whatever reason you find appropriate. If you're going to be offended that someone doesn't wholeheartedly accept your equating a peak musical experience with God, that's too bad.
Gary
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Eventually, Gary, I think we may meet somewhere in the middle.
I didn't say I am offended by your views or your proposal about the "sufficient reasons" or because you don't espouse my view that there might be "something" divine in music. I just said that you answer a whole argumentation by giving "labels", always in the offensive side (particularly this "overheated messianic rhetoric" was too..."overheated").
As for your proposal, your argument to enjoy music for whatever reason sufficient we may found is absolutely pertinent and valid, if our quest was about how and why we enjoy music. However, if we wish to address this Post's subject, we have to face the question, whether we experience (and trace) something more, beyond our enjoyment (or even the lack of it), when we listen to (classical) music. I hope this time we may start understanding (if not comprehending) each other.Thanks,Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Yesterday I listened to
the wonderful Beethoven's Ninth with Abbado and the Berlin
Philharmonic on Sony, and was left in a state of exhilaration, awe
and humility in the face of such a triumph of human achievement.
If those with such a disposition would see god in anything, they
would surely see him in that?
But why? As has been
argued above, the religious motivation of the composer is not a
reliable guide, and in this case, the use of Schiller's Ode to Joy
suggests a humanistic inspiration. There's no such clue for the late
string quartets which, for this listener at least sound inspired by
something very powerful and profound indeed, whatever it was.
It is the social and
historical context in which these musical triumphs are heard now that
suggests the answer to me. When the age-old religious sensibility
that found expression in myth, metaphor and poetry got high-jacked in
defence of power and authority, it became necessary to enforcement a
literal “truth” on the faithful.
Blake's “To see a
world in a grain of sand/ And a heaven in a wild flower/ Hold
infinity in the palm of your hand/ And eternity in an hour” has a
metaphorical truth and speaks to that ancient sensibility. But it
won't provide the “mind-forged manacles” religious and secular
authority requires. So man made god in his own image. That image
changes with human susceptibilities: he used to have to be feared and
acted with vengeance, now he listens to your prayers and loves you.
(Though not those innocent human and other sentient beings who suffer
indescribable pain and misery, for some reason.)
Two millennia of
enforcement of dogma, intolerance and the persecution of dissent,
demonisation of other faith positions, creating, sustaining and
justifying hatred of the other; the symbiotic relationship with state
power; the long-held monopoly of learning and art. Today, the
indoctrination of the young (without which organised religion would
be a rare a Druidism in a few generations), the slavish deference
that all media pays to anything connected to religion, however
unreasonable (exceeded only by the sycophantic fawning to the
soap-opera of royalty); the default position of so many people,
otherwise indifferent to faith, who are not discouraged from
believing that religion equals morality.
It takes a lot to keep
this charade intact but it frays at the edges with each and every
appeal to reason. There is a sad desperation in those defending the
unreasonable. Hearing god in classical music speaks to a paucity of
the true values that make us human, clinging to the illusion of a
literal divine.
But hey, it's a free
country – thanks to the values of secular humanism. Without which
the expression of these views would by the tortuous twisting of
ambiguous ancient texts no doubt justify burning at the stake.
Vic.
PS Apologies for the layout. It happens when I copy and paste from my wp and I don't seem to be able to edit it out. Looks kind of neat though.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Perhaps, certain composers thought that they were injecting a God into their music, perhaps, some of them thought that their music was written to, and for, the Glory of God, others thought that they had been inspired by, even heard, their God speak to them (note, however, that Beethoven stated that his Mass came from the heart).
I do not care, particularly, and think more fool them but that does not diminish the power of their music.
If anything this God nonsense attempts to diminish that power i.e. it is not of humankind but god-given. Ugh!
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I stand in awe and humility, Vic, at this long but eloquent triumph of your human achievement.
I am truly glad that, under your conditionality, you admit that in the Ninth of Abbado with the Berliners (on Sony), one may see God, despite that, in the rest of the text, you almost completely overturn this statement. I share your affinity and predilection with the "human achievements" and "humanity" and so on. I am also a defender of the obvious: our achievements as humans, but there are so many despicable "achievements" of our negativity, relativity, mortality, meaness, hypocrisy, interest, subjectivity and so on, that almost offset the great works of human frailty. Therefore, somewhere in our humanism, there lie some...loopholes, that, one day may sink all our civilisation. However, to use the expression of Aligator Dumbarton, I "share the train of your thoughts".
Since I see you have a strong appreciation and good knowledge of Beethoven's music, I wish to remind you of two works that play a crucial role for his struggle to deal with...It (Es, in German):
a) In his String Quartet in a-moll, op 132, in the quite long slow movement, Beethoven put a long title with which "thanks the unknown God for recovering from a serious illness", that may had cost him his life. This gratitude for the new lease of life, the great composer expresses with arguably the most sublime piece he ever composed. The second theme (the ever ascending melody on the violins) is a lasting ascension to the light, particularly after the very sombre first theme (representing the despair of a very ill man). Definitely, it is a human achievement, but I don't think it simply celebrates the triumph of the human spirit.
b) In his last String Quartet, in F major, op 135, in the last movement, he puts the title "Muss Es sein? - Es muss sein" (must It be? - It must be). So, maybe Beethoven give us the way out, in his struggle (almost at the very end of his life) to deal with the Unknown "It". And he opts for "It must be". The crucial word is the "muss" (must), which implies that, even if there is not, it must be. In this amazingly powerful and emotional movement, Beethoven puts trhee times the question in music with a very ominous and dark theme on the lower strings and three times he gives as a resolution an almost light and optimistic theme, culminating in a soft triumph, in the straightforward key of F major (the "Pastorale" key). What this "Es" may mean to Beethoven is of lesser importance (that's why he dis not want to specify it). The key issue is the answer!
So, maybe (after 40 inputs in this topic), in this quest of finding the Unknown It to the (classical) music, the answer might be that the Great Music make us sometimes to wonder at the multiple facets of Truth and the multifold texture of reality.
Parla
P.S. : Very intriguing, Troyen1, this "God-given" "God-nonsense", but don't worry. Even a "God-nonsense" can only enhance "that Power" (of Music).
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I guess according to Parla, a word salad a day keeps the sane folks away.
Gary
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
And a spirit salad a day brings the insane folks back any day! (I can label too, Gary, despite I hate it, because practically destroys any kind of dialogue).
Sorry, I thought we were somewhere close...Maybe, next year.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I think this has gotten away from the original post, so to be extremely simplistic let me just say that if you believe in God you will find his/her (as your preference may be) presence everywhere - nature, the arts, your fellow human, etc. If you don't believe in God, then so what? Life still goes on and you can enjoy it on your own terms.
Bliss
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Libera me, Domine, de morte aeterna, in die illa tremenda;
Phew!
I sang it for the first time in my local cathedral as a school boy aged eleven in the school choir, and then again at seventeen...
and it still frightens me somewhat when I hear it...
but then again, I'm a believer, as the Monkeys sang...
All the best everyone
Partsong
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive


"Something" being the talent of the composer? The skill of the musician? Isn't that "something"?
-Gary