Top Five

73 replies [Last post]
BazzaRiley
BazzaRiley's picture
Offline
Joined: 14th Mar 2010
Posts: 314
RE: Top Five RE: Top Five

janeeliotgardiner wrote:
Only one pick for Brahms so far?

Shocking. Today I would take him and say sorry to Dmitri Dmitriyevich.

Graham J
Graham J's picture
Offline
Joined: 24th Sep 2011
Posts: 84
RE: Top Five

Schubert, Beethoven, Brahms and Haydn are easy choices for me. In the end I'll also go for Mahler but strange that I was not sure as I've always reckoned he was my favourite composer. Perhaps it is because he wrote relatively few works and there is more to explore in Shostakovich, Strauss, Janacek, Sibelius and Britten as my runner ups.

Mozart I've always admired without really falling in love with and Bruckner, great that he is, would be too much of the same. I never have enough time to get into Wagner but I almost picked him because floating around in space with nothing to do would at least give me the opportunity I've always craved!

Graham

Graham J
Graham J's picture
Offline
Joined: 24th Sep 2011
Posts: 84
RE: Top Five

Schubert, Beethoven, Brahms and Haydn are easy choices for me. In the end I'll also go for Mahler but strange that I was not sure as I've always reckoned he was my favourite composer. Perhaps it is because he wrote relatively few works and there is more to explore in Shostakovich, Strauss, Janacek, Sibelius and Britten as my runner ups.

Mozart I've always admired without really falling in love with and Bruckner, great that he is, would be too much of the same. I never have enough time to get into Wagner but I almost picked him because floating around in space with nothing to do would at least give me the opportunity I've always craved!

Graham

Graham J
Graham J's picture
Offline
Joined: 24th Sep 2011
Posts: 84
RE: Top Five

Sorry about the double post. I dropped my iPad.

Bliss
Bliss's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2010
Posts: 213
RE: Top Five

It's not easy coming up with five. One I can do with no thought at all: Vaughan Williams. The others are subject to daily change depending on my mood.

1. Vaughan Williams
2. Elgar
3. Mozart
4. Brahms
5. Bernard Herrmann

__________________

Bliss

naupilus
naupilus's picture
Offline
Joined: 7th Apr 2010
Posts: 372
RE: Top Five

Graham J wrote:
Sorry about the double post. I dropped my iPad.

Name dropper! :-)

__________________

Naupilus

naupilus
naupilus's picture
Offline
Joined: 7th Apr 2010
Posts: 372
RE: Top Five

Bliss wrote:
It's not easy coming up with five. One I can do with no thought at all: Vaughan Williams. The others are subject to daily change depending on my mood.

1. Vaughan Williams
2. Elgar
3. Mozart
4. Brahms
5. Bernard Herrmann

Bliss - lovely call on Bernard Hermann. I have to say that the opening of 'North by Northwest' is one of the most exciting pieces of film music I know. Must have been a difficult choice between Hermann and Elmer Bernstein?!

__________________

Naupilus

Bliss
Bliss's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2010
Posts: 213
RE: Top Five

[/quote]

Bliss - lovely call on Bernard Hermann. I have to say that the opening of 'North by Northwest' is one of the most exciting pieces of film music I know. Must have been a difficult choice between Hermann and Elmer Bernstein?!

[/quote]

Yes, Bernstein's "To Kill a Mockingbird" music suits the movie perfectly, but I'm more familiar with Herrmann, having 36 CDs and 35 LPs (some duplicated on CD) of his film and concert music. One of my Herrmann favorites is a score he wrote for an episode of the TV program The Twilight Zone. It's called "Walking Distance."

__________________

Bliss

BazzaRiley
BazzaRiley's picture
Offline
Joined: 14th Mar 2010
Posts: 314
RE: Top Five

Big Herrmann fan here too - but hopefully we will also be able to take the films of five directors and so Hitch and Scorsese (what a score Herrmann wrote for "Taxi Driver") will be there.

eyeresist
eyeresist's picture
Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2010
Posts: 113
RE: Top Five RE: Top Five

janeeliotgardiner wrote:
1. With one exception, everyone has picked Beethoven. Surprised? I was......a bit.

2. The "early" Romantics - Chopin, Mendelssohn, Schumann - have done very badly. Not a single vote so far.

3. Other notable omissions: Tchaikovsky, Richard Strauss.......

4. No French composers!

5. Only one pick for Brahms so far??? (Just what does a guy have to do to get on the spaceship?)

All this seems correct to me - if a cull is really required.

The plight of the early to middle Romantics is something I've idly considered recently - really, they fall between the stools of clean, elegant Classicism and pungently emotive Late Romanticism. More recent polystylistic works combine the two elements in a way I find more satisfactory, by retaining the purity of the separate elements.

1. Mahler

2. Bruckner

3. Prokofiev

4. Shostakovich

5. Vaughan Williams

Note: I am the third person to omit Beethoven (after Arbutus and Bliss.)

What I really regret is having to leave behind the one-hit-wonders (some of whom had more than one hit): Kalinnikov's 1st, the best of Schnittke, the top Vivaldi concertos, Holst's Planets & military suites...

__________________

'Art doesn't need philosophers. It just needs to communicate from soul to soul.' Alejandro Jodorowsky

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2089
RE: Top Five

One thing that you missed in your early "summary", Jane, is the observation that people soon will start missing what they left behind than enjoying what they took with them.

Parla

CARLOS PINHEIRO JR
CARLOS PINHEIRO JR's picture
Offline
Joined: 22nd May 2011
Posts: 68
RE: Top Five

Here goes:

- Beethoven

- Brahms

- Bartók

- Prokofiev

- Brubeck

 

eyeresist
eyeresist's picture
Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2010
Posts: 113
RE: Top Five

CARLOS PINHEIRO JR wrote:
- Beethoven

- Brahms

- Bartók

- Prokofiev

- Brubeck

Surely, for consistency's sake, that should be Brokofiev?

__________________

'Art doesn't need philosophers. It just needs to communicate from soul to soul.' Alejandro Jodorowsky

janeeliotgardiner
janeeliotgardiner's picture
Online
Joined: 22nd Nov 2012
Posts: 156
RE: Top Five

 

parla wrote:
One thing that you missed in your early "summary", Jane, is the observation that people soon will start missing what they left behind than enjoying what they took with them.

Perhaps. But at least the rest of us will have our top five for consolation. You, on the other hand, will have nothing.

janeeliotgardiner
janeeliotgardiner's picture
Online
Joined: 22nd Nov 2012
Posts: 156
RE: Top Five RE: Top Five

eyeresist wrote:
The plight of the early to middle Romantics is something I've idly considered recently - really, they fall between the stools of clean, elegant Classicism and pungently emotive Late Romanticism.

 

Stools as in "stool sample"?