way into Bartók's quartets?

18 replies [Last post]
jknibb
jknibb's picture
Offline
Joined: 17th Oct 2010
Posts: 2

Just joined the site - hope this is an appropriate topic!

A friend and I were talking about the music we just can't get into, those CDs that sit on the shelf reproaching us for not being more culturally versatile. Bartók's quartets are in that category for me. The friend suggested I try skipping 1 and 2 and start with 3, then 4 and 5.

I've had the Takács set for a long time so I've had several serious goes at 3. I may be starting to warm to it slightly but it's hard going. Following the score has helped slightly, but the main block I think is the harmonic and melodic language. I'm a huge fan of much 20thC music (Debussy, Ravel, Poulenc, Sibelius, Mahler, Messiaen, Janácek, Szymanowski, Britten, Tippett, ...) and, strangely, some Bartók works are among my favourite music - the Conc for Orch, Music for Str, Perc and Celesta, Bluebeard and the piano concertos in particular.

I'm well used to enjoying music that lacks surface appeal, but I just seem to have a Bartók quartet blind spot. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to approach it? This is music I would like to like!

tagalie
tagalie's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2010
Posts: 800
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

Don't sweat it. There's no law that says you have to like every composer nor everything a composer wrote. I got into the Bartok quartets early in my explorations of classical music and started with 3 and 4, the old Fine Arts recordings. I too got a copy of the score (of #4) and grew to love both works. So I can't improve on the suggestions you've been given so far. I must say I don't like any of the other 4 as much as these two, but that's life. Like every other music lover, there are composers who just don't do it for me. Even with those I love, there are parts of the canon that leave me cold. The completist's journey is fraught with disappointments.

dubrob
dubrob's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 276
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

Hi Tagalie, don´t you like Bartok´s 5th quartet? There are sounds in the slow movement that have haunted me all my life, absolutely unlike anything I´ve heard, although I do agree the third and fourth are better overall. As for advice it is hard for me to give any, as Bartok´s middle quartets made an instant appeal to me, with their mix of brutal energy, strange ways of playing the instruments, and that night music. Speaking of which I forgot to say that the Lento of Still´s Third Symphony is a real find, it has that mix of uncertain major minor harmonies that creates an otherworldly feeling that I love, sincere thanks. 

Alun Severn
Alun Severn's picture
Offline
Joined: 13th Oct 2010
Posts: 28
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

jknibb,  Until just very recently I would have asked the same question. Over thirty years ago I listened routinely to all six. For various reasons -- less time, other listening interests, a preoccupation with jazz -- I abandoned them. Recently I have returned to them, a natural extension of an obsession I have developed with quartet music.

THis time I found it harder. I eventually 'broke through the barrier' by ignoring the first qt and beginning with the second and working through.

Once the progression from 2 to 6 had sort of sunk in, I returned -- just, literally -- to the first, and found it as marvellous as the others.

I'm not sure what it takes other than -- like most things, I suppose -- patience and application. Eventually, the enjoyment starts to flow, almost of its own accord. Good luck in listening.

tagalie
tagalie's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2010
Posts: 800
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

dubrob wrote:

Hi Tagalie, don´t you like Bartok´s 5th quartet? There are sounds in the slow movement that have haunted me all my life, absolutely unlike anything I´ve heard, although I do agree the third and fourth are better overall. As for advice it is hard for me to give any, as Bartok´s middle quartets made an instant appeal to me, with their mix of brutal energy, strange ways of playing the instruments, and that night music. Speaking of which I forgot to say that the Lento of Still´s Third Symphony is a real find, it has that mix of uncertain major minor harmonies that creates an otherworldly feeling that I love, sincere thanks. 

 

Hey there Dubrob! Isn't that Still a haunting work? Not great music perhaps, but a distinctive voice that strikes a strange chord.

I don't dislike any of the Bartok quartets. It's just that none of them have hit me as hard as 3 and 4. And I still haven't found a set that matches my memory of the Fine Arts performances.

The way a piece of music can lie dormant for us for years, then suddenly and for some unknown reason hit us like a ton of bricks, has always fascinated me. It's a good reason to keep giving the occasional listen to stuff we don't really like.

dubrob
dubrob's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 276
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

Couldn´t agree more Tagalie. It´s amazing just how much our perception of a work, especially our initial perception, depends on our mood, our level of concentration, how awake we are, what has gone before. What you said happened to me a couple of weeks ago with Les Troyens. I´ve never disliked it, but could never it was one of my favourites, but one Sunday evening I took it down of the shelf, all 5 lps worth, and sat hypnotised for the next three hours, stunning stuff. Choral music has always been my biggest hurdle in classical music, but I´ve never heard anyone write it as well as Berlioz.

Peter Street
Peter Street's picture
Offline
Joined: 22nd Sep 2010
Posts: 63
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

I had the chance to spend time at the 1955 Edinburgh Festival and booked for three quartet recitals including Beethoven's three Razumowsky quartets, which I knew.   The Hungarian Quartet coupled each of them with one of the last three Bartok quartets, which I didn't know.  I was almost completely ignorant of Bartok at the time, and he was still regarded as very highbrow indeed.  In the first two concerts the Razumowsky came first, and I could make absolutely nothing of the Bartok Fourth Quartet, though I remember the glissandi particularly.   Next day, the Fifth and the second Razumowsky appeared to have something in common - energy and contemplative repose in each.   The third concert began with Bartok's Sixth Quartet, which struck home straight away,  and the final Beethoven was the perfect conclusion to the series.   The only thing I recall about the presentation was that the notes were by Colin Mason, and the only thing I remember about them was what he wrote about Beethoven's F major quartet.   As it happened I didn't hear the Fourth Quartet afterwards half as often as the other two, even before I got 5 and 6 on disc, but  I soon got to know them fairly well.   I suspect that one way in might still be to listen to the later quartets along with Beethoven,  and this might also work with the First Quartet, which is overtly (late) Beethovenian anyway.  With the Second, the very Bartokian middle ostinato movement is easy enough to come to grips with.   None of the published guides to the Third seems to work, but I do recall a broadcast by Anthony Hopkins in the late fifties (and not even on the Third Programme )that talked it through simply in a way the current Radio Three Sunday afternoon analysis programmes just don't try to, which opened most of the doors.   I was probably lucky I heard  the Hungarian Quartet.   Bartok had written his violin concerto for the leader, Szekely, and in their early days Sandor Vegh had been a member.  On the other hand, neither of their recorded Beethoven cycles recaptures what I remember hearing then.   I don't actually know their DG Bartok cycle, but the 78s they made of Nos 5 and 6, which I got for a shilling a disc, were constant companions for many years.   Listening a movement at a time, I think, was the thing to do.

__________________

Peter Street

Petra01
Petra01's picture
Offline
Joined: 16th Mar 2010
Posts: 272
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

Hello. I've also been wanting to explore more of Bartok's music:  including his quartets and also have been intrigued by his works for violin and piano or solo violin [and his piano concertos...but I'll leave that alone here! ! :)].  I'm not at all familiar with them, I enjoy some 20th century works (much yet to explore) like many others here.  Think that I'll probably end up purchasing the Takacs recordings of the quartets.  One question that I have re the quartets and the various recordings, sometimes I feel like some of the more modern recordings of East Central European composers works in particular kind of blow through the recordings so fast that they lose the "folk" and any sort of "lyrical/melodic" element to the pieces.  I realize here also that Bartok is MUCH more modern in compositional style than say someone like Dvorak!  I can't read music (or play anything sadly), so it's not like I can pick up a score and follow along (though I also understand that it's not easy to interpret a composer's notations).  I also used to do things like folk dancing (years ago!), so I'm looking forward to seeing how some of these elements are incorporated into the music.

Listening to Isabelle Faust's featured recording of one of Bartok's violin sonatas made me wonder (enjoyable as it was) if her recording was on the fast side compared with others?  And if perhaps, others here had any thoughts as to other recordings that I should try either first or in combination with her 2-cd set?

And also how you feel/think of the Takacs set vs. others of the quartets with these thoughts in mind?  Sorry, I hope that I'm not digressing too far from your original post?!

Looking forward to your thoughts.

Best wishes,

Petra

jknibb
jknibb's picture
Offline
Joined: 17th Oct 2010
Posts: 2
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

Thanks for the fascinating replies so far!

Tagalie and dubrob, I completely agree - why does a piece suddenly grab us one time and not another? Increasingly I listen to music using my iPod on shuffle without looking at the name of the track until it's finished - there's enough music in my collection that I can't immediately identify or haven't listened to for a long time to make this a lot of fun. Yesterday I did this and had no idea what I was listening to - I decided it must be a serious composer with Messiaen influences who I must have shamefully neglected. What was it? Bernstein's concerto for orchestra. No way would I have listened to that in the same way if I'd known who wrote it.

Peter - what an interesting idea, to listen to Bartok beside Beethoven. Oddly enough I was at the Wigmore last night and heard op 59 no 2 followed by Britten's third quartet. I don't know the Rasumovsky quartets at all and was pleasantly surprised (I'm not a massive LvB fan). The Britten I've had on disc for a while but haven't been gripped by like I was last night; whether it was the proximity of the Beethoven or just that it was live I don't know.

Thinking about it a bit more, there are composers whose harmonic language is quite as strange to me as Bartok's but who I can listen to quite happily - James MacMillan or late Tippett for example. I think the difference is that I can respond to aspects of the drama that don't depend on harmony, like watching a play in a foreign language. The Bartok quartets feel more like listening to someone explaining something in a foreign language - so maybe I should listen for other cues to the drama and not worry about the language so much.

Petra - the solo violin works I don't know at all so I'll leave those for others to comment on. I've lived with Maurizio Pollini's recordings of the first two piano concertos on DG for a long time and found them very easy to enjoy. Like parts of the Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta, and not unlike the Rite of Spring, I find the rhythm and sheer energy of those works exhilarating. Oddly, the third concerto leaves me relatively cold (I'm aware this is a minority view...). Jean-Efflam Bavouzet's recent recordings of the concertos were very well reviewed but I haven't heard them yet.

Off to have another go at number 3!
JK.

dubrob
dubrob's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 276
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

jknibb I´m with you on your verdict of Bartok´s third concerto. It leaves me more than cold, it leaves me very sad, as if a great great artist has been broken by sickness and loneliness and with a desire for recognition or wanting to give people what they want he has written something well below his earlier works. It´s still a lovely work, but compared to Bartok´s best it´s a pale shadow for me.

As for earlier comments about the quartets by a strange coincidence I´ve spent the last couple of days comparing the Hungarian Quartet´s cycle and that of the Vermeer on Naxos. I recently emigrated and about 99% of my LPs and CDs and I are in differnt countries, so I´m ransacking what the local library here can offer me.

I find the Hungarian Quartet too slow for my liking. Although it is a wonderfully close recording and you can hear the interplay of the instruments better than on the Naxos, which sounds like it was recorded in a cavern in comparison, I feel the Hungarians shy away from the savagery in the middle quartets and try to tone down the radical aspects of Bartok´s writing which I don´t like. While the Vermeer don´t always pull it off I admire the way they really get stuck into the angular rhythms, cutting knifelike chords and hell for leather tempo which I think will always be more appropriate in any allegro movement trying to encapsulate folk music. As someone brought up on Tommy Peoples of the Bothy Band playing the fiddle, it can be sweet when it´s a ballad or a lament, but when it´s a jig or a reel it´s devils music. This is why I feel the Hungarians are far better in Quartet´s 1,2 and 6. The ensemble even sounds a bit sloppy for me in No.4. I don´t have a score so this is only a gut feeling. The Takacs are an all round good listen, and I remember enjoying the Juilliard in the middle quartets, and the old Fine Arts if you can find it. As for the Violin Sonatas I can´t think of one recording that stands out head and shoulders above the others.

Peter Street
Peter Street's picture
Offline
Joined: 22nd Sep 2010
Posts: 63
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

I have recently played around with some of the Bartok quartet posts on u-Tube and it's astonishing how varied performances are, though Bartok tried more or less to lay down precise guidelines for tempi at least.   The Vermeer I found very disappointing when I bought the Naxos set a year or two back,  but I've always liked the Juilliard set from the sixties. which doesn't, even in the fourth quartet, come across all that aggressively.   I'm a bit wary of speed for speed's sake, and of overdoing the violence - these are very carefully worked out pieces, and they refer to violence rather than enact it for its own sake.  Bartok's own piano playing wasn't in any way violent, and there was nothing wrong with his technique.    And even reels are danced with an underlying couthy decorum, however wild the tunes may sound.  Might not that be the way with Romanian and Hungarian folk dances too?

__________________

Peter Street

dubrob
dubrob's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 276
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

I certainly would never favour speed for speed´s sake, or any kind of histrionics to make the music seem like something it´s not. I did use the word savagery, but maybe I shouldn´t. Bartok´s quartets are meticulously crafted and I don´t believe there´s a note of them that is there without a structural purpose. It is fascinating just how different alternative interpretations can be, it´s just there´s a sound in Bartok that I like when I hear it, and that tends to be more aggressive in the faster movements, but I also think some lesser quartets do charge through them to cover up the fact that the ensemble playing will show its gaping seams if they played any slower. 

Petra01
Petra01's picture
Offline
Joined: 16th Mar 2010
Posts: 272
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

Hello all.  It's nice to read your stories about how you came to know the quartets and your experiences listening to different recordings of them.: :)

Dubrob, I'm so sorry that you've had to leave most of your music behind! :(  I'm hoping that this is a very temporary separation for you? [And as a side note:  re Tommy Peoples and the Bothy Band, you have fine taste there sir! :) ("sir" I think?).  But yes, whilst I appreciate fast, I too do not believe in "fast for fast's sake".  My favourite performances (of be it folk, classical, or whatever other kind of music) are those in which the performers have that ever elusive "it" and know when to slow down or speed up, when to pause, ....have the ability to grab you and hook you...and now I'm going to give up trying to describe this in words! :lol:

Peter, sounds like that you found a good way into them! :)  Good commentaries/notes can really help one to appreciate new works.  I'm rather envious of your concert history! :)  Good for you.

Sometimes, I think, that one just needs to be in the right mood to hear something different and appreciate it, othertimes I think maybe that ones exposure to (and enjoyment of) other music which is maybe somehow or another related to the music in question can help.  Or maybe the stars are just aligned correctly? ;)  For instance, whilst exploring more cello music, I read about Kodaly's concerto, asked a friend about it (which he heartedly recommended), bought a copy of it, and played it.  Could not get into it!  Found it more jarring and irritating than anything else and set it aside for many months.

Then went back to it; I was blown away by it!  You could have knocked me over with a feather (after lifting my jaw back up). :D  I am so glad that I gave it another chance!  It would have been my loss.

Thank you also for the piano concerto thoughts....I'd been leaning towards the Bavouzet cd (for starters anyway) and I found them on sale.  Think that I might then try the G. Anda recording at a later date.

Warm wishes,

Petra

p.s.  I wish that one could see the whole posting history of this thread; it would be helpful for recalling peoples' comments, their names, etc. in terms of responding better!  Could this become a reality o' "G. gurus of all things computer-related"? :D Please?

 

dubrob
dubrob's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 276
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

Hi Petra, sir it is, thanks for your sympathy and yes I hope the separation want be a moment longer than is unavoidable, but  I´m not too miserable; it means I have to listen to everything of interest in the local library, which will take a while. Just one thing, you said Kodaly Cello Concerto, you didn´t mean Cello Sonata by any chance?, because that is most certainly a work worth hearing, as is the duo for violin and cello.  

Petra01
Petra01's picture
Offline
Joined: 16th Mar 2010
Posts: 272
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

dubrob wrote:

Hi Petra, sir it is, thanks for your sympathy and yes I hope the separation want be a moment longer than is unavoidable, but  I´m not too miserable; it means I have to listen to everything of interest in the local library, which will take a while. Just one thing, you said Kodaly Cello Concerto, you didn´t mean Cello Sonata by any chance?, because that is most certainly a work worth hearing, as is the duo for violin and cello.  

Hello Dubrob,

Yes, of course, my goof with regards to the Kodaly Cello Sonata! Thank you. The recording that I have is with Jiri Barta (cello) and Jan Cech (piano) on Supraphon.  It also has Kodaly's Sonata for Cello and Piano, Op.4 and Vitezslav Novak's Sonata for Cello and Piano, Op.68 which I also enjoy (though I love Kodaly's solo cello piece! :)).  And, ooooh!  A new piece to explore! I don't recall having heard a work before by Kodaly for cello and violin.  I'll do some double-checking in a bit [already took a quick look]...another reason to finish ripping my cds or spending some time trying to get ahold of a different system for cataloging them.

So, tell me (at the risk of vering--temporarily so--off course here, so whose recording(s) do you like of that work? I'd love to hear about it! :)

Best wishes,

Petra

p.s.  Almost forgot to add this....ask your local librarian too (if you haven't already) about inter-library loan.  *Most libraries have some sort of regional set up whereby they can share books and cds with other "local" libraries.  Also ask them how to search and access the database that includes this area (if you haven't already).  My guess is that it will be free for you to request these cds.  If you want to go outside of that area (like out-of-state), there may be a fee.  This can be particularly helpful if you have a small local library.  Note:  also make sure that under the description it says "cd" and not "lp" unless you have managed to acquire one of those already since your move! :D

*Aren't libraries wonderful!  One can explore all kinds of music and books for free! :)  At least in the US....not certain from which country you are currently writing!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petra01
Petra01's picture
Offline
Joined: 16th Mar 2010
Posts: 272
RE: way into Bartók's quartets?

jknibb wrote:

Thanks for the fascinating replies so far!

Tagalie and dubrob, I completely agree - why does a piece suddenly grab us one time and not another? Increasingly I listen to music using my iPod on shuffle without looking at the name of the track until it's finished - there's enough music in my collection that I can't immediately identify or haven't listened to for a long time to make this a lot of fun. Yesterday I did this and had no idea what I was listening to - I decided it must be a serious composer with Messiaen influences who I must have shamefully neglected. What was it? Bernstein's concerto for orchestra. No way would I have listened to that in the same way if I'd known who wrote it.

Peter - what an interesting idea, to listen to Bartok beside Beethoven. Oddly enough I was at the Wigmore last night and heard op 59 no 2 followed by Britten's third quartet. I don't know the Rasumovsky quartets at all and was pleasantly surprised (I'm not a massive LvB fan). The Britten I've had on disc for a while but haven't been gripped by like I was last night; whether it was the proximity of the Beethoven or just that it was live I don't know.

Thinking about it a bit more, there are composers whose harmonic language is quite as strange to me as Bartok's but who I can listen to quite happily - James MacMillan or late Tippett for example. I think the difference is that I can respond to aspects of the drama that don't depend on harmony, like watching a play in a foreign language. The Bartok quartets feel more like listening to someone explaining something in a foreign language - so maybe I should listen for other cues to the drama and not worry about the language so much.

Petra - the solo violin works I don't know at all so I'll leave those for others to comment on. I've lived with Maurizio Pollini's recordings of the first two piano concertos on DG for a long time and found them very easy to enjoy. Like parts of the Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta, and not unlike the Rite of Spring, I find the rhythm and sheer energy of those works exhilarating. Oddly, the third concerto leaves me relatively cold (I'm aware this is a minority view...). Jean-Efflam Bavouzet's recent recordings of the concertos were very well reviewed but I haven't heard them yet.

Off to have another go at number 3!
JK.

 

Hi Jknibb,

How did your listen of Bartok's No. 3 go the other night?  Any better? And your talk of Britten's string quartets reminded me that I haven't heard back from a friend (who had recommended that I listen to the second one) as to which recordings he enjoys.  I don't know them at all, but am willing to give them a go (budget permitting!).  Someone on this site had started a thread, but sadly, no one has responded as of yet! I hope that you enjoyed the performance?

Best wishes,

Petra