Anybody still listen to LPs?
Hi VicJayL,
Pardon my ignorance but what is a DS player?
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I would like to see more coverage of this topic: "How do LP collectors clean their discs?"
Now you're taking me back! At the back end of the lp era I went through a period probably identifiable in terms of psychological disorder, with zerostat pistols, brushes and velvets and cleaning fluids. Over time I came to the conclusion those fluids were doing more harm than good, sometimes producing faint swishes on the disc. To restore the sound I finally resorted to the technique mum would have recommended: warm water and soap, using one of those fancy micro-bristle record-cleaning brushes to work suds into the grooves. In most cases it did the trick perfectly. My recording of Harper and Tear performing Britten's Serenade and Les Illuminations today sounds as clean as the day I bought it after going through a crackle and swishy period. In quieter spots you can hear birds in the background far more clearly than you can on the remastered cd.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Ultimately, yes - you can't add back what was never captured, after all (although perhaps some types of distortion added by the playback format may 'mask' deficiencies in the source?).
Fwiw, I've always rather liked Mercury 'Living Presence' recordings from the early/mid-1950's to the late 60s - notably the ones made on 35mm film stock - although I've only heard them on CD, not LP, so maybe haven't heard them at their best.
That said, the original master tapes were transferred to digital by Wilma Cozart Fine, who was recording director for many of the originals (and her husband, Bob Fine, was the series' original recording engineer). They used the same techniques - and even restored versions of the original equipment - that they used for the LP releases to master the CDs. Even if it only played a small part in the final sound, at least it served to keep one variable (relatively) constant.
I must see if I actually have any recordings on both LP and CD (or mp3/flac) - I'm uncertain because I have to admit that I rarely play LPs any more, and tend to forget what I've got. (Not playing LPs isn't a matter of 'preference' regarding sound, incidentally, merely convenience.)
I don't know that series of comparisons, but an obvious question would be - did they know to which format they were listening?
Also, since ICRC started in 1995, perhaps the quality of mastering/transfer of the CDs they listened to might have fallen short of current standards?
"Louder! Louder! I can still hear the singers!"
- Richard Strauss to the orchestra, at a rehearsal.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I'm planning to buy one of those exotic turntables that make a hole in your bank account - am I decadent or what?..........
'After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music'.
Aldous Huxley brainyquote.com
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Hi VicJayL,
Pardon my ignorance but what is a DS player?
Hi 33lp,
It's a machine which replays music captured and stored via a lossless format like FLAC. Presumably the DS stands for "digital streaming". Mine is from Linn Products but other good ones include Naim's and Meridian's, I believe.
All my CDs are ripped and stored on a separate unit (mine's a Ripnas. NAS = network attached storage.) The benefits include convenience of use (all my music accessed via an iPad, wirelessly) and better sound quality because of no distortion caused by the mechanics of a CD player, and also, music downloaded at superior quality to CD's 16bit. It also plays internet radio, which at high bitrates like 320kbps is very good indeed. Radio 3 is soon to be broadcast at this rate, I hear.
If you enjoy controversy, see the "Lossless format" thread where these issues are challenged.
And as we are in the present thread, good as the DS is, my vinyl set-up, at its best, has the edge in sound quality - but it's close.
Vic.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
In my line of work I am constantly hearing stories of the massive difference in the music quality of vinyl LP records and CDs.
The usual comment is that although digital recorded CDs have a very clean and clinical sound, the listening pleasure is often limited to only an hour or two because of hearing fatigue.
I have transferred many Lyrita LPs to CD amongst other record labels and the end result is breathtaking, lifelike, natural and and a complete joy to listen to capturing the original magic of the performance!
It seems that the listening experience back in the 1970s/80s from LPs had that pure and rich sound that could be listened to for hours on end with no hint of abrasiveness.
So, the question still remains - do serious enthusiasts still listen to LPs or CDs?
In my experience both are acceptable but LP records successfully transcribed to CDR with the aid of EMT & Cedar, well, I know where I would put my vote!
John L.G.Shaw (Shaw Sounds)
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Earlier in the thread I wrote:
Or maybe I actually have.
There's an interview with Wilma Cozart Fine - in the yellow side-boxes on the left hand side - in which she discusses the transfer of the original Mercury Living Presence recordings to CD.
She's asked
"CD is a completely different medium. How do you perceive it? Do you think it has its restrictions?"
to which she replies:
"Yes, my husband always said that the sampling rate was too low. But the CD's are closer to the masters, the original tapes, than the Lp's." [my bold]
And if anyone is still interested ;-) the review of "You Are There! The True Story of a Legendary Label" (a limited edition compilation of 22 representative tracks produced in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Mercury label) is worth a look.
"Louder! Louder! I can still hear the singers!"
- Richard Strauss to the orchestra, at a rehearsal.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Yes SpiderJon I had read Wilma Cozart's comment as I have the booklet you indicated given out with a sampler CD some years ago. Thanks for reminding me about the Mercurys though, I hadn't played any for a while. I have a quite a number on CD but only half a dozen on LP although I see that Speakers Corner who put out the facsimiles of the early Decca stereos some years ago (mostly still available) have now turned their attention to Mercurys. I did though try a couple of comparisons. The only one I had complete in both formats is Dorati's Respighi Airs & Dances where I marginally preferred the CD to a 1970s Dutch LP (probably not made from an original mastertape). The only other item I have in both formats, due to different compilations, is Liszt's second Hungarian Rhapsody (Dorati LSO) and here I preferred the LP (on an American Mercury Wing LP pressing). So, swings & roundabouts.
I have always thought the late 50s and early 60s LSO the brightest, brashest and most virtuosic of orchestras but do sometimes wonder if that is due to the brilliance of the Decca & Mercury recordings of the time. Dorati was said to have knocked the re-formed orchestra into shape after it almost dissolved in the late 50s and they play brilliantly for him and yet it was said (Richard Morrison's book on the LSO) that most of the musicians hated him!
The short lived Everest label too followed Mercury's recording techniques and I see some have re-surfaced on CD. A few years ago some appeared on limited edition LPs made from the original 3 track masters "using all vacuum tube playback & mastering equipment". A couple of them, Copland conducting Copland and Susskind in Copland & Gould, LSO again, are splendid performances beautifully recorded in Walthamstow Town Hall in 1958 and the pressings are immaculate.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Kev said
I'm planning to buy one of those exotic turntables....
Good luck, I never cease to be amazed at the variety available, even up to the price of a small car! Tell us how you get on but hope you've got some funds left for a good, preferably valve, phono stage.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Hi Vic thanks your comments on digital streaming, I had read last month in Gramophone the review of the Naim device but was still unsure as to what it actually did. I may be being a bit dense here but how does the music get into the Linn DS device? Do you download music from the internet into a computer and then does the DS device extract it from the computer in digital form and convert it to analogue in better quality than merely connecting the computer audio out to a stereo system or am I missing something?
Does it connect directly to the internet and if so is this via the wireless modem supplied by one's internet provider?
Lastly if your CDs are ripped to a separate unit doesn't this rely on a hard drive for storage which will lose everything when it ultimately expires?
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Generalising, yes - devices like the Naim's Uniti and UnitiQute, Linn's DS series, Airport Express, Apple TV and Squeezeboxes of various flavours and audiophile credentials are basically conduits to audio stored on a hard drive; either your PC or Mac or a dedicated storage Network Attached Storage device.
Most of these devices can do it both wirelessly and wired, though a small number are wired-network only (though this can be circumvented with the addition of a wireless extender if the device isn't anywhere near your router).
I have all my files backed up in two places *other* than the main location, lest any should ever expire (this needn't be expensive - 250GB of storage, £30, Tescos).
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
John's answer covers all the bases and "basically conduits to audio stored on a hard drive" sorts it out for me too.
I must say that although I came across the DS player by accident (I went to my dealer expecting to upgrade my CD player), I have been absolutely delighted with its discovery and can't recommend it highly enough - for convenience, security and stability, and sound quality. The dealer set up all the considerable interfaces (if that's what they are called) but it has been delightful ever since.
I never play CDs anymore and play vinyl on the LP12 much less now. I would replace the majority of vinyl for digital now if I could afford to, I find the DS that good (with the qualification I made in the earlier post).
What really blows me away though is "studio quality" 24bit downloads and the high bitrate internet radio it gives access to.
I'm not sure how prices of the various players compare, or even their relative quality (the rest of my system is Linn, which I trust so stuck with them) but I would recommend music lovers explore this new and exciting medium for themselves.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
So would I, I find it usually superior to CD (by 'it' I mean the medium, as opposed to the Linn player specifically - I currently have a NaimUniti in my possession, but have in the past used an Airport Express and DACMagic to very good effect), and vastly superior to vinyl as played on my admittedly modest turntable (sorry for the heresy) - so much so that I sold it about 9 months ago.
I think the cheapest Linn DS player is the Sneaky, which has built in amplification and can be had for £800, but the range goes up to the Klimax at about £12,000.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Thanks John & Vic I think I'm a bit more with it now. All I've done to date is connect the miniature jack on the PC to the audio set up (valve amp) which just happens to be in the same room so I guess quality is limited by the PC's somewhat basic DAC & audio stages. Certainly on the Gramophone Player Sutherland's Cast Diva is no match for the CD or LP sounding somewhat veiled, lacking in treble and the sense of the Kingsway Hall's acoustic notable in the other formats is hardly noticeable.
What I have found great though is the British Institute of Recorded Sound archive to re-discover some great piano 78s that have never made it CD and here I find the sound generally very good as they do not seem to have emasculated the originals with excessive noise reduction from the dreaded (to me at least) CEDAR system.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive


SpiderJon wrote
"the sound from vinyl is heavily distorted...much vinyl was digitally recorded..."
Yes and with digital sound the analogue waveform is chopped up into millions of pieces to put on a CD or whatever and then re-assembled in the CD player in the hope it will match exactly the original waveform which of course it cannot do unless the sampling rate is infinite. The key question then becomes is the sampling rate sufficient for the effect of the lost information to be audible? So it's no doubt a matter of personal preference whether one prefers the "heavily distorted vinyl" to the chopped up re-assembled digital (where CD players are not perfect either and their jitter can impact upon sound quality). I do however agree though and have said above that LP replay will vary much more with one's equipment than will CD.
As for LPs being digitally recorded, yes, but only from around 1980. I have a small number and with the exception of one piano LP (Michelangeli Schubert & Brahms on DG) the sound is not so good and not up to analogue master LPs.
The most important factor however is the quality of the original recording and for me at least most modern orchestral recordings are generally inferior to those of half a century ago, lacking the presence and immediacy of the older recordings whether the latter are on LP or CD. Whether this is due to technology, the differing tastes of today's producers and engineers or the use of unsuitable venues (like the Barbican) I don't know, probably a combination, but they lack the sheer visceral impact and sense of "being there" of some of Decca's early Kingsway Hall efforts. Listening recently (on LP) to the LSO/Monteux "Enigma", from I think 1958, both performance & recording are stunning
I have a number of recordings in both formats and usually prefer the LP but there is the odd case when I prefer the CD transfer and in one case I did a direct A/B comparison with one of Decca's best Geneva recordings switching between the two and ended up not knowing which I was listening to! In the first issues of International Classical Record Collector magazine (then a Gramophone publication) a panel of critics, musicians & producers compared recordings in both formats. Whilst they noted differences in different LP issues, they always placed the audio quality of the CD last.