Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

28 replies [Last post]
troyen1
troyen1's picture
Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2010
Posts: 716
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

Me, RFH, sixties, Zuckerman, Du Pre, Barenboim with Mehta conducting. I forget what orchestra.

I thought that there were plenty of recordings. More than enough.

oscar.olavarria
oscar.olavarria's picture
Online
Joined: 15th Oct 2012
Posts: 115
RE: Unforgiven omission!!!

Dear firends, you ve forgetted the Pierre Fournier, Geza Anda, Wolfgang Schneiderhan s version of this work, with the RIAS Orchestra conducted by Ferenc Fricsay, elegant, virtuose, for me the best version of this work, unforgiven omission!! oscar.olavarria

50milliarden
50milliarden's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2012
Posts: 188
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

The Triple Concerto gotta be one of my least favorite works by Beethoven. To me it embodies everything that's superficial and empty about the key of C major (together with the 5th symphony finale). The piece is like one of those boisterous, ill-mannered and not too bright people you meet at a party and whom you can't get rid of - and who treats you to a long-winded pompous tale full of self-glorification.

That said, I had a chuckle when I first heard about this famous Richter/Karajan tale. Didn't know it was about the Triple Concerto, but if I remember correctly, Richter wanted to do another take of a certain passage which he was unsatisfied with, and Karajan replied, "Oh no, we don't have time for that, we still have to do the cover photos."

And still this recording ended up in EMI's GROC series. I wonder if they mentioned in the booklet notes that Richter disowned it? Madness.

Given my antipathy against the piece, I was surprised I could still dig up 3 performances on cd from my collection.
First, the already mentioned Arrau/Szeryng/Starker/Inbal recording. Fabous piano playing by Arrau, who has to be one of the greatest Beethoven performers of all time, certainly when it comes to his chamber music. (I recently re-listened to his wartime recording of the complete B. violin sonatas, with Szigeti - Arrau's noble, almost artistocratic Beethoven playing is absolutely breathtaking there, more so than in his later re-recording with Grumiaux.)

Then the Oistrach/Knushishevitzky/Oborin/Sargent recording on EMI. Both recordings are with the Philharmonia, but I prefer Arrau/Szeryng/Starker/Inbal.

But I can't say I listened much to these performances. Thing is that they both have the Brahms Double Concerto as a "filler", and that's a piece that I value much, MUCH higher. So Brahms got on repeat, and Beethoven was never to be heard again.

Third, a cd with Kalichtein, Laredo, Robinson and the English CO, Alexander Gibson. Was part of Brilliant Classics' complete Beethoven edition. Can't say it made much of an impression.

sapper
sapper's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Oct 2012
Posts: 2
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

There's a version by the Beaux Arts Trio w/ Haitink and the LPO that I've always been fond of.  Being a regularly performing ensemble versus 3 star soloists, the performance is a bit more coherent than others I've heard.  

__________________

sapper

oscar.olavarria
oscar.olavarria's picture
Online
Joined: 15th Oct 2012
Posts: 115
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

there are other versions of this marvellous work: Suk Trio (Josef Suk, Jan Panenka and Josef Chuchro) with the Czech Philharmonic Orch. conducted by Kurt Masur, in Supraphon label; Trio Zingara with the English Chamber Orch. conducted by Edward Heath, in IMP Classics, and more recently Jeno Jando, Dong Suk Kang and cellist Maria Kliegel in NAXOS, with conductor Bela Drahos, a bargain title but interesting version. Personally I dont like Claudio Arrau, Szeryng, Starker/Eliahu Inbal version, I ve found Arrau s participation deslucid, specially in 3th movt final "coda". oscar.olavarria

parla
parla's picture
Online
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2092
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

There is an abundance of very good performances out there. Choose the one it suits you. There is not the "single out" performance only. The more you listen, the more you...discover and...learn.

However, 50m, the "Triple" is one of the marvels of the great Ludwig's opus and a unique work for such forces. There is such a variety of beautiful melodies (not a common feature for Beethoven), excellent and evolving orchestration, brilliant balance among the instruments and, as always with this composer, the amazingly beautiful and meaningful form.

As for the "superficial and empty" C major, 50m, check the composer's String Quartet op.59, no.3 or the Cello Sonata op.105, no.1. Or Mozart's String Quintet, K.515 and the Jupiter Symphony. Or Haydn's Symphony No.97 and Schumann's Symphony No.2 or even Schubert's "Great", let alone the incredibly "full" Pleludes and Fugues from the two Books of the "Well-Tempered Clavier" by Bach.

Parla

oscar.olavarria
oscar.olavarria's picture
Online
Joined: 15th Oct 2012
Posts: 115
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

Dear Parla, I agree absolutely with you in your opinion!!, clap,clap, clap,clap oscar.olavarria

50milliarden
50milliarden's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2012
Posts: 188
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

parla wrote:

There is an abundance of very good performances out there. Choose the one it suits you. There is not the "single out" performance only. The more you listen, the more you...discover and...learn.

However, 50m, the "Triple" is one of the marvels of the great Ludwig's opus and a unique work for such forces. There is such a variety of beautiful melodies (not a common feature for Beethoven), excellent and evolving orchestration, brilliant balance among the instruments and, as always with this composer, the amazingly beautiful and meaningful form.

As for the "superficial and empty" C major, 50m, check the composer's String Quartet op.59, no.3 or the Cello Sonata op.105, no.1. Or Mozart's String Quintet, K.515 and the Jupiter Symphony. Or Haydn's Symphony No.97 and Schumann's Symphony No.2 or even Schubert's "Great", let alone the incredibly "full" Pleludes and Fugues from the two Books of the "Well-Tempered Clavier" by Bach.

Parla

Well, I didn't mean that every piece in C major is by definition shallow and bland... the fact that the list of pieces you quoted contain many of my favorites (though I prefer Mozart's G minor quintet over his C major one) is proof of the opposite.
It's just that the sharp and flatless key got some bad rep during the 19th century, and many composers avoided it like the plague, specially when it was their intention to write something "deep". Ab major? Excellent! E major? Great? C major? What am I, the town fiddler?
Just count the number of intense slow movements from romantic symphonies or quartets that are written in C major - there are very little, compared to more exotic or flat/sharp-rich keys. (This peculiar fact should be the subject of a musicologist study, really...)

Anyway, the main culprit is often identified as Beethoven's 5th symphony finale. The quintessial C major piece, nuff said.

In my humble opinion, the triple concerto suffers from "C-majoritis" as well. Just like the Choral Phantasy, another piece I absolutely can't stand.
Of course the piece contains many beautiful melodies (not so rare in Beethoven as one could think...) but compared to every other B. concerto it falls flat even in that respect. I'm surprised you singled out the orchestration as well - it appears to me to be the most square-ish and unimaginative orchestral score that B. produced. Not surprisingly, since most of the thematic material is covered by the 3 soloists already. (the same problem manifests itself in Bach's concertos for multiple keyboards. How are you supposed to to give the orchestra something meaningful to do when you have to keep 4, 6 or 8 hands busy at the same time?)

parla
parla's picture
Online
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2092
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

Well, 50m, I'm glad you admit that C major is not, by definition, a bland and shallow key. As for its "bad rep during the 19th century and many composers avoided like the plague", please kindly note, only in the Symphonic genre, the following Symphonies which all had written in C major:

Balakirev's No.1, Bargiel's op.30, Beethoven's No1 (a great work at any rate and by any standard), Berwald's No.3, Bizet's single Symphony, Draeseke's No.3 (Tragica), Dukas single Symphony, Fuchs' No.1, Lindblad's No.1, Prokofiev's No.4, Raff's No.2, Rimsky-Korsakov's No.3, Ropartz' No.4, Rubinstein's No.2 (Ocean), Schubert's Nos.6 & 9, Schumann's No.2, Sibelius' Nos.3 & 7, Stravinsky's, Spohr's No.7, Wagner's and the two Symphonies by Weber.

On the flip side, searching to compose something "deep", see how many Symphonies we have in A flat major: Elgar's First and one by...Vanhal! On E major: the superb Seventh by Bruckner along with Bruch's 3rd and Scriabin's First. Even in the Classic period only two out of 104 Symphonies by Haydn are in E major. Few String Quartets, two Piano Trios and a couple of his Piano Sonatas are in E major too. Haydn also composed one Piano Trio in A flat major. Another bit known works on A flat are the First Concerto for two Pianos by Mendelssohn and a more neglected Piano Concerto by Field. Probably, the most substantive work in A flat is the Mass no.5, D.678, by Schubert.

So, from the above, you may realize that the C major is a Major key, very significant and dear to composers, at least on and for different occasions. Masterpieces written in this key are plenty and very substantive. We should not forget for example the monumental String Quintet or the "Wanderer" Fantasy by Schubert, Beethoven's "Waldstein", Mozart's String Quartet "the Dissonances" and the superb Fantasie op.17 by Schumann.

Finally, do not neglect that the "simplest key due to its lack of sharps and flats", serves at the same time the relative minor, namely the a minor, too. So, is the a minor also the simplest, boring, flat etc tonality? We should not also overlook that, in most cases, the c minor works find their resolutions in a triumphant C major (not only Beethoven's Fifth).

Going back to the Triple Concerto, I mention the orchestration, not because it is colourful or inventive, but because it is highly effective. If you check the score or you can follow a live performance or even you may listen it in a state of the art recording (in a proper equipment), you'll see how wonderfully the orchestra works by supporting the three soloists, conversing with them or introducing and recapitulating the thematic material, in a very energetic and highly positive way. I can assure you the role of the Orchestra is absolutely meaningful and fully justified.

Parla

50milliarden
50milliarden's picture
Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2012
Posts: 188
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

Parla, you're gonna make me feel guilty for investing so much time in replying to my humble posts. :)

And again, you're right: C major pieces aplenty. But how many romantic pieces do you know that have a C major movement as a slow, "deep", emotional adagio? That was my point: romantic composers tended to avoid this key when they reached Zen territory. And that's where Ab major and E major come into play. not as the keys of first movements.
It's not something new or shocking either. I think Scriabin (whom you mentioned already) wrote a complete theory about keys and their "colors", something that later culminated in his use of a "color keyboard" in Prometheus.

parla
parla's picture
Online
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2092
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

I see you keep scorning, in a way, the glorious C major.

Now we need a slow, "deep", emotional adagio. That's require some thorough research, but, at first glance, there is the First version (1887) of the slow movement of Bruckner's 8th (in c minor).

In order to have slow movements in C, you should have relevant or relative tonalities in the First Movement. In the Classical period, a great deal of the F and G major compositions have a C major for their slow movements (C is the dominant and the subdominant of F and G major respectively). Often C major was the choice for a slow movement in a minor or c minor had a C major slow movement (relative and tonic major respectively).

Finally, from a research with some friends/musicians/experts, we tend to agree that the two most significant keys in all Classical tonal music is the E flat from the major ones and the d minor from the minor ones. These two come a bit more often in frequency than the very important c minor and the jubillant D major.

Parla

oscar.olavarria
oscar.olavarria's picture
Online
Joined: 15th Oct 2012
Posts: 115
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

"There's a version by the Beaux Arts Trio w/ Haitink and the LPO that
I've always been fond of.  Being a regularly performing ensemble
versus 3 star soloists, the performance is a bit more coherent than
others I've heard" (sapper wrote)

 

 

Dear sapper, that version  efectively exists, but the conductor is not Bernard Haitink (fortunately too!!), but Maestro Kurt Masur with the Gewandhaus Orchestra, including the Choral Fantasy with pianist Menahem Pressler. Regards oscar.olavarria

c hris johnson
c hris johnson's picture
Offline
Joined: 8th Sep 2010
Posts: 793
RE: Beethoven Triple Concerto (Karajan)

Oscar, Sapper is not wrong; there are two versions with the Beaux Arts Trio, the first with Haitink, the second is the one you know with Masur. Like you though, one of my favourites is the recording by Pierre Fournier, Geza Anda and Wolfgang Schneiderhan, with the RIAS Orchestra conducted by Ferenc Fricsay.

Chris

 

__________________

Chris A.Gnostic