Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

23 replies [Last post]
tagalie
tagalie's picture
Offline
Joined: 29th Mar 2010
Posts: 716
RE: Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

Solomon/Dobrowen in #2 still, 50 years after first hearing it, one of my top 3 all-time most treasured classical recordings. It's a performance that's on fire from first note to last, glorious playing by the Philharmonia with a magical solo by Haydn Rogerson in the slow movement.

#1 is a bit more problematical. I'm still looking for the recording that's in my head. Gilels/Jochum comes closest. Honourable mentions to Serkin - saw him perform it in Toronto in the 70s - and Curzon. Tempi are so important in this work. The opening must be portentous without sounding pompous or turning into a dirge and the piano entry has to, in my ideal version at least, almost contradict what has gone before.

oscar.olavarria
oscar.olavarria's picture
Offline
Joined: 14th Oct 2012
Posts: 72
RE: Ferencsik

like you know my preferred version in # 1 is Peter Donohoe-Yevgeni Svetlanov with the Philharmonia Orch., but recently I had the ocassion to hear Alexis Weissenberg-Ricardo Muti version of this work with Philadelphia Orch in Emi "encore", and because of that may be that Im would be changing to that version: a diaphanous orchestral conduction, a precise and clear digitation from the soloistand and a luminous sound. Thanks to this recording was possible to me to appreciate details in the work that I hadnt hear never before!), excellent sound also. Ill would be changing to Weissenberg until now! Also comes Cesar Franks "Variations for piano and orchestra" with Karajan-Berlin, excellent too!. What do you think about this recording?? oscar.olavarria

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 1815
RE: Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

Check also the Dichter/Masur recordings of both concertos, particularly on the Pentatone SACD transfers. You may approve them. At least, you may enjoy the clarity and transparency of the lines, the very realistic dynamics, the wonderful Gewandhaus Leipzig Orch. and some more.

Parla

YiPeng8210
YiPeng8210's picture
Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2010
Posts: 12
RE: Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

I have liked the Zimerman/Bernstein/VPO recordings of both very much. 

Granted, I know that people may not like his approach to the First. However it is a very introspective version that offers us new insights. I like it that Zimerman doesn't push too hard in this concerto and he comes closer to the struggles that Brahms was going through when he couldn't cope with the attempted suicide of Schumann.

The Zimerman/Bernstein/VPO Second is very fine too.

Anand Ramachandran
Anand Ramachandran's picture
Offline
Joined: 12th Apr 2012
Posts: 17
RE: Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

I would recommend Gilels/Jochum and Freire/Chailly. regards Anand

whnew1
whnew1's picture
Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2010
Posts: 11
RE: Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

If asked to choose just one of each, I'd have to opt for Kovacevich/Davis in the 2nd and Curzon/Szell in the 1st. But that's an impossibly unfair task, especially with these protean works. I enjoy the Zimmerman/Bernstein 2nd a lot more than any Gramophone or Penguin Guide critics ever seemed to; similarly, that crowd always loved Gilels/Jochum more than I did. (But I'm willing to give them a listen again.)

I was slightly disappointed by the highly-praised Chailly set, as I was by the Fischer/Szell re-issues for the same reason: to my ears, the orchestra was just not recorded assertively enough. I've found the Schmidt-Isserstedt accompaniment for Brendel's analog 1st very vibrant and I still yank that off the shelves. For that matter, the recently-released Brendel/Colin Davis pairing of the 1st from the 80s is a nice souvenir of a partnership that was never a partnership, given that both had similar repertory and were under contract to Philips during the same years, the height of their recording careers.

I never understood why Decca allowed the Ashkenazy/Haitink set to go out of production, as they're enjoyable for those who insist on studio digital sound and they always seemed more lively to me than Kovacevich's set with Sawallisch.

When I was younger, I had nearly 20 recordings of #2 on LP and have close to that number on CD. It makes it that much harder to assess the more celebrated choices among performances with Pollini, Arrau, Watts, Barenboim and Richter (to name others...). Yet I rarely listen to Backhaus/Boehm because I am always troubled by the glaring, clangorous error in the downward coda section of the scherzo.

HvK rarely seemed to record either Brahms piano concerto with a high-profile pianist, nor did his recordings ever hit the big-time: but I liked the conducting of the scherzo in his DG set with Geza Anda. Anyone else like it?

Best,

Bill

 

 

Hugh Jarsse
Hugh Jarsse's picture
Offline
Joined: 31st Dec 2012
Posts: 50
RE: Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

In the first, which for all it's drama is the lesser achievement, probably Pollini/Bohm. In the second Gilels for once stands out, with Reiner as does Serkin/Szel.  Ashkenazy/Haitink is well played and well recorded but the tempo drops just a little too much in places. Richter has the opposite problem in his RCA recording, the man with the whip is driving just a little bit too fast.

CARLOS PINHEIRO JR
CARLOS PINHEIRO JR's picture
Offline
Joined: 22nd May 2011
Posts: 49
RE: Brahms' piano concertos, which are the best??

For my money, Freire/Chailly in the first concerto, Gilels/Reiner in the second. I also like very much the Horowitz/Toscanini 1948 second concerto, in spite of the sizzling-sausages surface noise (it's a live off-the-air recording).