Karajan "The vienna Years"
Who are you and what have you done with the real SN/ Rf-R/ Brodsky and all the others?
Vic.
They are still alive Victor but locked away in a room in my castle. I Have the key. Their fate is non of your concern.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
LD1 wrote:
"Karajan's recordings at this time do show a freshness of purpose perhaps absent from his more polished later readings".
Agreed LD1! His conducting of Bach and Mozart was so much lighter, crisper in those days too. Comparison between the early London/Vienna Mass in B minor and his later recording is revealing. The early recording is almost ahead of its time, the later one seems like a dinosaur.
And the early Mozarts, Figaro, Zauberflote, Cosi fan Tutte, so much fresher, and with humour - something he quickly lost.
Chris
I agree Chris - he was probably too busy to be really good with humour. There was something else he lost as well, which is tellingly revealed in that 1944 Bruckner VIII I mentioned in the historical Bruckner thread - and that is humility. I do rather like Karajan's Olympian view of Bruckner actually, but the Adagio in 1944, whilst almost identical in design to the late 1988 reading in Vienna, has a sense of humbleness that is most affecting and was rarely present in Karajan's later work. This is another early example of why this conductor was able to scale the heights he did so quickly after the war - the unhurried interpretation of Karajan's conception of the work is already there, but the playing of the orchestra, the strings in particular, is quite phenomenal and the performance is also quite something - that this was achieved in the difficult and dark days of Berlin in 1944, in the early medium of studio recording, beggars belief really. As does the sound - the last movement was done in stereo and sounds quite astonishing! Typically, once Karajan had heard the results, he wanted to re-record the whole lot again in stereo !!!!!
LD
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
"in deference to Senor Olavarria, who must be horrified that his
original thread has been highjacked by the Nazis and Herr Bruckner.
But Karajan's recordings at this time do show a freshness of purpose perhaps absent from his more polished later readings" (LD said)
"Senor Olavarria" dear D?, if you wanted to say "señor" (Mr in english), thanks for that, but if you really wanted to say "senior"?...I forgive you just this time! jajaja (laughs)
About the rest of your message, to the contrary I've read with great pleasure the all forum members interventions, which I found highly interesting, rigurous and informed, and of a high level, what serves to demonstrates that this forum is not "healthy", as someone here said.
Besides, the high number of replies to my question makes me feel proud, because like Parla said once I'm only a newcomer at this site.
Best wishes, dear friend.oscar.olavarria
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Pleased you haven't been offended - and apologies for me not knowing how to put the accidental on Senor on my computer (it was meant to be "Mr"!)
I'm looking forward to reading your comments too on the remainder of your early Karajan discs as well !
LD1
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
… apologies for me not knowing how to put the accidental on Senor on my computer (it was meant to be "Mr"!) … !
LD1
Dear Mr. Denham,
Press and hold the ALT key; then use the numeric keypad to enter the following four digits: 0241. Release the ALT key, and there's your <ñ>!
Your comment reminded me of an amusing attempt at politeness I saw some years ago on a completely unrelated forum. An English or American commenter who was trying to be gentlemanly toward a Dutch interlocutor kept replying to him as 'Mynhair'. The Dutch gentleman was too polite to correct him, and I was laughing too hard to keep adequate control over my fingers on the keyboard. (Nor could I stop myself thinking of the word shampoo.)
All in all, there have been many interesting comments on the topic of this thread. I quite agree that some of K.'s Vienna performances are indeed 'fresher'—i.e., less inclined to be overthought—but I think others are simply rougher, less subtle (put otherwise, underthought). Lack of subtlety was certainly not something Karajan was criticised for in the seventies and eighties.
All best.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Thank you Señor McCarthy ! I'm only pleased Oscar has a good sense of humour !!
That said, I agree with your comments regarding the earlier Karajan recordings when comparing them to the later ones. With the exception of the Strauss Metamorphosen and the first Philharmonia Sibelius Five, I nearly always prefer the later renditions, although of course he only recorded the Reznicek, Roussel and Balakirev the once. I'm sure you have read it already, but this period is most interestingly documented in Richard Osborne's biography on Karajan "A Life in Music" - an awful lot of planning had to go into thinking when side breaks had to occur as well as dealing with the vagaries of the fuel supply in post-war Vienna. In particular, the story of the chorus disappearing behind a cloud of their own vapour in a freezing cold hall once they had started singing in the final movement of Beethoven's Ninth amusingly seems to sum everything up !
LD1
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
One of the other characteristics of Karajan's output, was the rather sparcely filled records. An example, Beethoven's 4th on one LP record with no additional overtures. That is being a little bit arrogant, though the record covers were very intriguing.
DSM
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Carlos Kleiber has done the same thing, on Orfeo. However, I trust this is the production team and the label's arrogance or shortcomings rather than the conductor's.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
From Karajan's Vienna years, though obviously not recorded in Vienna, I've just been listening again to the wonderful performance of Wagner's Tristan und Isolde he conducted at the 1952 Bayreuth Festival, issued in pretty good sound on Orfeo. Erotic, powerful, wonderfully played and sung: nothing 'rough' about it except where it should be rough. Besides Karajan, it also seems to me one of the finest testimonies to the art of its Isolde, Marta Mödl.
I suspect even those not fond of Karajan (amongst whom I include myself, as far as his later recordings are concerned) would be impressed, hearing it blind!
Chris
Chris A.Gnostic
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Just so! Not least because reading such a well-chilled anecdote is far preferable to experiencing it in the flesh!
(I mean to imply nothing grumpy or cheaply sardonic in the preceding remark, incidentally. I have occasionally related mud- and misery-free details of my reluctant combat service in Vietnam many decades ago, and I am, thank the good Lord, at an age where my scrubbed recollections have practically routed my unscrubbed ones, even on my own memory's ground.)
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Chris
I agree entirely about this splendid performance, Chris, about Mödl's as well. The Siegfried with Aldenhoff (from the previous year, was it?) is virtually as wonderful.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I agree entirely about this splendid performance, Chris, about Mödl's as well. The Siegfried with Aldenhoff (from the previous year, was it?) is virtually as wonderful.
Yes indeed, and it was 1951, though it was Varnay, not Mödl as Brünnhhilde. So far only Rheingold and Siegfried have surfaced from Karajan's cycle, and in pretty wretched sound unfortunately. The EMI Walküre Act 3 offers a glimpse of what might have been, and there are persistent rumours that EMI's tapes of the rest still exist, but alas no sign so far.
Chris
Chris A.Gnostic
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Karajan has a strange way about a grace note in the Beeth 4 1st mvt.
As mentioned in the worst CD covers thread, some of the EMI operas got the maestro covered.
The (original release) of the HvK Nielsen CD is the 2nd shortest I got (after the 1st CD of Blomstedt's Mahler 2, which has a total running time of ~20 min). But in the former it's worth every sec of it.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive


LD1 wrote:
"Karajan's recordings at this time do show a freshness of purpose perhaps absent from his more polished later readings".
Agreed LD1! His conducting of Bach and Mozart was so much lighter, crisper in those days too. Comparison between the early London/Vienna Mass in B minor and his later recording is revealing. The early recording is almost ahead of its time, the later one seems like a dinosaur.
And the early Mozarts, Figaro, Zauberflote, Cosi fan Tutte, so much fresher, and with humour - something he quickly lost.
Chris
Chris A.Gnostic