Recommend me the definitive Vaughan Williams 5th recording please.
Further support for Vaughan Williams himself. It has enormous individuality, and really doesn't sound that bad. Barbirolli in stereo would be a good companion. He was the first conductor to record the piece commercially.
Peter Street
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Further support for Vaughan Williams himself. It has enormous individuality, and really doesn't sound that bad. Barbirolli in stereo would be a good companion. He was the first conductor to record the piece commercially.
Peter Street
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Further support for Vaughan Williams himself. It has enormous individuality, and really doesn't sound that bad. Barbirolli in stereo would be a good companion. He was the first conductor to record the piece commercially.
Peter Street
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I like the Previn/LSO, though lately I feel it is slightly overdone. Must hear his Telarc recording sometime - hopefully not as 'ambient' as his rerecording of 2. Two conductors I'm not usually fond of do very well: Handley and Thomson.
OTOH, Boult and Barbirolli do little for me, the latter in particular seems to lack expressiveness here. Haitink = meh, as usual, and same with Bakels. Gibson's old recording is alright, but doesn't match my top three faves.
'Art doesn't need philosophers. It just needs to communicate from soul to soul.' Alejandro Jodorowsky
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Have people seen that the Halle under Mark Elder will be issuing a disc of the 5th and 8th Symphonies next month? Could be very interesting.
John
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Wow this is hard to do...I have at least 11 different recordings and all have their merits. I do agree with the already mentioned Andre Previn/LSO, on RCA 1990, as well as Bryden Thomson/LSO on Chandos (1993 I think). I also rather fancy Yehudi Menuhin with the Royal Phil Orchestra, on Virgin ltd. (anyone remember that one?). Honorable mention also for "Glorious John", the EMI classic recording!
Through gradually tightening avenues, I felt the ecstasy of something nameless. __Nocturna Artificialia__
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
I'm sure all your "11 different recordings have their merits", Jared, but the initiator of this thread (who, apparently, has already left us) was interested in the definitive recording. A futile task, but some people beleive in this sort of quest for the best.
I only have half a dozen recordings of this Symphony and, while I appreciate the "merits" of each one of them, I don't espouse all of them, in the same way. Finally, I don't think I will go for the new one with Sir Mark...on Halle, while I'm sure it will have enough merits for someone to chase it.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
the initiator of this thread (who, apparently, has already left us) was interested in the definitive recording. A futile task, but some people beleive in this sort of quest for the best.
Parla, the initiator of this thread was interested in other members' opinions as to the best recordings; nowhere did he use the word "definitive". That word is however implicit in all your many pronouncements on what goes and what doesn't, most notably your rejection of the validity of personal taste in the matter of the established "canon" of great composers and their music. You're not engaged in any sort of "quest for the best" - because you're convinced you've already found it.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Guillaume, the initiator use the word "definitive" in the title of the subject of this thread and that's enough. In his introductory text, he points out the word "Best" to add, only in parenthesis, "in their own opinion". However, even if it is, in their opinion, the quest is for the best, isn't it?
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
Strange. I listened to the Previn last night for the first time in years and for the first time was horrified by the recording. Even my wife, for whom this performance used to be a top desert island pick, asked me to switch to the Handley after the second movement and commented how much better the sound was. For me, this underlines a factor that most discussions on recording quality miss: our ears become educated, able to pick out micro differences. So I take all claims that the human ear can't detect, say, the difference between 24 and 16 bit recording, with a big pinch of salt. State-of-the-art today is noticeably sub-par tomorrow.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
The sad paradox is that the more you spend on your sound system, the worse most of your records will sound ;)
'Art doesn't need philosophers. It just needs to communicate from soul to soul.' Alejandro Jodorowsky
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
This is debatable, eyeresist. It didn't happen to me, anyway. Since I upgraded my system to higher levels, everything sounds better except for the old recordings, which show all the problems they were less obvious in a lower cost system. In other words, I believe it is a matter of finding the appropriate system, based on the recordings one has.
Parla
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive
The sad paradox is that the more you spend on your sound system, the worse most of your records will sound ;)
You're absolutely right. That old VW5 used to sound perfect. As Peter Walker used to say about his speakers, if you don't like what you hear, blame the recording.
- Login or register to post comments
- Flag as offensive


A very special word - such a moving performance.