The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

8 replies [Last post]
oscar.olavarria
oscar.olavarria's picture
Offline
Joined: 15th Oct 2012
Posts: 113

recently Ive heard Mahlers symphonies conducted by american conductor James Levine, with difeferent ochestras, in an economical box from Sony-RCA label, from the 70ths, and I think after listening the majority of the recordings available that this is for my taste one of the better integrals of all. In first place the 4th is like we know a classic, a beautiful, delicious and contrasted version with superlative sound; the 5th at similar level than Barshai-Deustche Junge Orchester in "Laurel"/Brilliant label; the 6th, an energetic and virtuosistic version, near to the best versions of this work, for me Gary Bertini, Mitropoulos and Tennstedt recordings; the 7th perhaps the best recording of this work, for over Sinopoli, Abbado (3 recordings)and Scherchen-Vienna Symphony Orch, in Orfeo; the 3th and 9th...also superlatives. Although incomplete this is first option in a non expensive edition, translated to 24 bits, conducted by an (in general) menospreciated conductor, that surprisingly demostrates to be an excellent mahlerian!!  

And...Im not the only one that thinks so:

"These
recordings are all remarkable for their superb clarity and balance.
Detail is thrillingly present without being spot-lit exaggeratedly (as
is sadly often the case in Bernstein's CBS set)" R. C. Ross

"There
are so many breathtaking moments in these performances that it would be
hard to select highlights, but one outstanding example is Levine's
treatment of the last movement Adagio of the Ninth. Not even Karajan or
Bernstein generate the sense of timeless flow and poignant beauty he
achieves; details emerge without self-consciousness and climaxes are
shattering."......"Levine can be seriously considered on the level of the
two conductors who have hitherto led the field where the Mahler Fourth
Symphony is concerned--Kletzki (HMV Concert Classics) and Szell (CBS
Classics). His performance is a really beautiful one, which explores the
depths as well as the charms of this work, especially in the slow
movement, which is quite remarkable. ... The recording is one of great
clarity" Ralph Moore

"I've had more fun listening to these
performances than many of the recent Mahler recordings, such as ones by
MTT and Jansons. Levine seems to have more to say, and knows how to get
his interpretational choices across without making the playing feel
micromanaged and forced. If you're looking to buy more Mahler, this is
the way to go, especially given the extremely low price." R. D. Monsoon

"It
is enough to say that there are few, very few, recordings of this
tremendous symphony (6th)that are more complete in their precision,
sensitivity and power. Levine achieves a rare and greatly desirable
paradox: a reading that is penetratingly and eloquently objective while
being also and in equal measure profoundly responsive and personal." R.
C. Ross

What do you think about this recordings??. Best regards! oscar.olavarria

parla
parla's picture
Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2011
Posts: 2088
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

Relax, Oscar. Levine is good enough (to you and many others probably), but let's not overdo it. Let's not get that excited!

Parla

TedR
TedR's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 144
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

I collected these recordings on lp. I suppose (like Levine's RCA Brahms) their relative unavailability on CD for so long (except maybe in Japan) has made them a cult favourite.

However I have to say I don't hear anything extra special or extra interesting in any of them. They're good, well-played, middle of the road performances, like some other 1970s sets. My favourite is probably #1 (not one from the set that is often mentioned). The sound on the lps was typical for RCA of that era: multi-miked and not particularly distinguished. (I have a vague recollection that #10 was part digital.)

Ted

Alan B Cook
Alan B Cook's picture
Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2011
Posts: 15
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

Ted, 

Yes - you are right. I have the original RCA CD release (RD84553(2)) of Levine's recording of the 10th and in the booklet it gives recording dates of "April 3 1978: January 9 and 12 1980" and then states:-

"Although this entire album has been mastered directly from a digital tape, the first movement, in the interest of preserving a superb performance, was transferred to digital from an analogue original."

Alan

 

 

__________________

Alan C

oscar.olavarria
oscar.olavarria's picture
Offline
Joined: 15th Oct 2012
Posts: 113
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

"in the interest of preserving a superb performance..." (Ted said about the 10th)

 

I agree absolutely with you Ted, but ¿what about the other works?? Best regards oscar.olavarria

TedR
TedR's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 144
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

Hi Oscar - I didn't say that!! - it was a quote posted by Alan from RCA's publicity material. (The Adagio from the 10th was originally the coupling for the lp set of the 5th. The rest of the symphony was recorded later after digital recordings were introduced.)

As I said above, I would say these Levine recordings are good but not mega-outstanding. I listened again to number 5 on lp yesterday. Again it's pretty good and occasionally exciting, but to my ears Levine has an exaggerated tendency to grind the music to a halt. The 4th movement feels far too slow, unlike e.g. Bernstein (DG) who is not this slow and keeps the music flowing.

Ted    

Sidney Nuff
Sidney Nuff's picture
Offline
Joined: 12th Oct 2012
Posts: 140
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

Levine, Bernstein and Karajan were all great opera conductors but should have just stuck to opera or dance. They all needed the theatre to perform. Tchaikovsky likewise should have just stuck to opera and dance and left the more serious symphonic and chamber music to those with a little more taste.

TedR
TedR's picture
Offline
Joined: 23rd Apr 2010
Posts: 144
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

Sidney Nuff wrote:

Levine, Bernstein and Karajan were all great opera conductors but should have just stuck to opera or dance. They all needed the theatre to perform. Tchaikovsky likewise should have just stuck to opera and dance and left the more serious symphonic and chamber music to those with a little more taste.

presumably you could have said the same about Mahler himself, in which case what benefit does it bring to have his music only conducted by a Mr Sober? In any case even Mr Sober can be somewhat theatrical:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOY8uwwHMrU

Ted

 

 

Sidney Nuff
Sidney Nuff's picture
Offline
Joined: 12th Oct 2012
Posts: 140
RE: The best Mahler! believe it....Levine!!

Especially when you slip vodka into his diet coke without him knowing.