BEETHOVEN Piano Trios
Growing older doesn’t always mean growing wiser‚ though in the case of the Beaux Arts Trio and Beethoven the passage of some 20odd years signalled a rare and fruitful broadening of musical vision. In the period between their two recordings of the Beethoven Piano Trios there had been just one personnel change. Daniel Guilet was replaced by exJuilliard Quartet second violin Isidore Cohen and yet I’ve known some ensembles (I’m thinking specifically of string quartets) where up to three members have changed without effecting such a significant shift in musical emphasis.
The principal route of the Beaux Arts’ interpretative development was forged by the pianist‚ Menahem Pressler‚ whose increased tonal subtlety and willingness to widen expressive dynamics lent the trio a whole new palette of colours. Just listen to the opening of Op 1 No 2’s ineffably deep Largo con espressione. Heard superficially‚ there’s not that much in it between the Pressler of the 1960s and of 1980‚ but labour the comparison and you’ll soon hear the benefits of a more variegated touch and a freer approach to phrasing. There are many other pluspoints. Op 70 No 2‚ for example‚ is less formal than before‚ more appreciative of Beethoven’s strange harmonic innovations (try the piano writing in the third movement) and with a more unbuttoned approach to the finale.
The Archduke is at once softergrained and more wistful than its energetic predecessor and you couldn’t hope for a happier rendition of the Septet transcription (ie‚ the E flat Trio‚ Op 38). When it comes to the D major Trio ‘after the Second Symphony’‚ the Beaux Arts hold a weightier view of the piece than the BeschBrandisBoettcher trio on DG‚ whose lighter‚ more overtly Haydnesque reading omits the first movement’s exposition repeat. That’s another reason for choosing the new Beaux Arts over the old: repeats‚ which were less plentiful in their earlier set.
Philips’ latest slimline packaging takes up roughly onethird of the original’s shelf space. The sound quality is of course just as good: clear‚ fullbodied and well balanced. The fatter ‘Early Years’ 1960s set is harder on the ear‚ appropriately so given the more severely Classical axis of the performances. As to CD rivals‚ I’d not want to be without the KempffSzeryngFournier set – resonantsounding it’s true‚ but a fine example of how three very distinct personalities could pool their musical resources for some highly distinctive interpretations. But given the price‚ the superior sound quality‚ the comprehensive coverage of repertoire (14 works as opposed to 11 in the 1960s Philips set) and the profundity of the Beaux Art’s later interpretative standpoint‚ this new reissue justifies a frontranking recommendation. So much is said with so much feeling – and so little fuss – that you’re drawn back again and again.